Only one affirming opinion, so no split in rationale (5 justices)
Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsberg dissented (2 dissenting opinions)
Decision (pdf, mirror 1): http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
Decision (pdf, mirror 2): http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-290.pdf
Decision (pdf, mirror 3 @TFL): http://www.thefiringline.com/library/07-290.pdf
Direct link to the page with the decision:
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07slipopinion.html
Commentary w/ liveblog of SCOTUS session:
http://www.scotusblog.com
SCOTUS Wiki page with links to oral argument transcripts and briefs:
http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=DC_v._Heller
Please read the decision before making comments about what the decision will do.
Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsberg dissented (2 dissenting opinions)
Decision (pdf, mirror 1): http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
Decision (pdf, mirror 2): http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-290.pdf
Decision (pdf, mirror 3 @TFL): http://www.thefiringline.com/library/07-290.pdf
Direct link to the page with the decision:
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07slipopinion.html
Commentary w/ liveblog of SCOTUS session:
http://www.scotusblog.com
SCOTUS Wiki page with links to oral argument transcripts and briefs:
http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=DC_v._Heller
Please read the decision before making comments about what the decision will do.