Imagine Bush Jr is elected. According to his party program he will issue a bunch of laws to better the economy. And he does. In particular the immigration laws and the restrictions for foreign companies become harsher (nothing new for a democrat/replublican change). Economy will of course react positive to that. Everybody is happy. More and more mexicans in the south are deported back to mexico, the southern states are relieved from the need to spend a lot of money on the issue, economy grows. Then there is some trouble on the border. A dictatorship established in mexico, hostile to the US democracy. Their dictator makes a great show out of vowing vengeance for the bad treatment of the mexicans in the US. Mexican troops march towards the US border. The US calls to arms and swiftly in just a few weeks a decisive victory over mexico is achieved. Everybody rejoices.
Years later, you are old and talk to your grandchildren.
GC: "Grand dad, you are evil!"
YOU: "What's wrong with you? Why am I evil?"
GC: "Your government killed millions and you did nothing! You even fought for them!"
YOU: "We didn't kill anybody! I fought to protect my believes and my country!"
GC: "No grand dad, those mexicans weren't brought back to mexico, they were brought to concentration camps in the desert! Millions died!"
YOU: "But that cannot be, that's socialist lies! Our own TV showed them crossing the border!"
GC: "Grand dad, your TV was centrally controlled after Bush passed the IT law set. And by the way, there weren't any troops at the mexican border either. Nor a dictator. You invaded that helpless country and conquered it. I hate you. You didn't do anything!"
Think about it. We humans tend to make the mistake of considering us smarter and better than past generations. A bad mistake.
Yet, I am inclined to believe that a new rising of a Hitler is less likely nowadays (not just in the US, but in most "western" countries). This is NOT because of any personal qualities of the in habitants though, but simply because the independence and reach of the media has increased dramatically in the last 50 years. Add to that the increase in education and you have a solid defence against dictatorships.
- Many no-gun countries have crime & homicide rates that exceed the US. Mexico, Japan (!), South Africa, and others...all disproving "guns=crime, no guns = no crime."
Japan is the only seriously comparable country in that list. You can't really compare a society that is vastly inferior in the economical and educational field. Japan is a good point though.
- Most of the gun-related homicides in the US are among active criminals. Actually few
moral, law-abiding citizens are harmed.
That is a VERY Good point. I failed to see that in the stats i checked.
- You have a God-given right to defend yourself, and to posess appropriate tools. Disarming the good will not eliminate the bad, it will encourage the bad to do more (Australia & England & Washington DC come to mind).
Well, that depends a bit on what God you are talking about here
If you are talking about the christian god then you don't have any right whatsoever to defend yourself. Read the bible, new testament. I read it in latin and greek. Both versions completely agree on this point. Good Christians = No Guns (I know that this simple equation there might drive a lot of christian gun owners here balistic. But that's the word of the lord. Letter by letter. Anything else is hypocriticism).
If are a muslim, well, then again you a screwed. No god given right for the either in the koran (yet at least here the more "wordly" abuse-interpretation of the koran includes the right for combat and killing).
If you are jewish, YES, then you have all the god given right you would ever want. There are entire sections in the Thora about it.
cheers
Helge