Headspacing 45acp lead bullets on the bullet

Master Blaster,

I am talking the 1970's. Back then Lake City still loaded the match ammo the military used. The AMU developing and loading its own ammo started later. I'm not sure exactly when.

No, I would not merely move a jacketed bullet into the throat without starting load workup over again. But it's a waste of time. The left group from my Goldcup was with Hornady 200 grain jacketed semi-wadcutters, and that wasn't touching the throat. The jacketed bullets seem to be able to self-align in the bore during firing and without distortion or shaving. Distortion is was screws up lead bullet accuracy.


Ozzieman,

No to case length. As I explained, the cases eventually become way too short. I took some Winchester brass through 50 reloading cycles, at which point three hundred of the original 1000 new bulk cases remained, the rest having split or been lost, and it was all 0.025" shorter by then. No way for it to headspace on a case mouth even in a tight chamber. You do have to adjust your taper crimp die down a bit for that.


ShootistPRS,

The 45ACP and most other rimless straight case ammo headspaces on the mouth of the case. There is no way that you can "headspace" on a bullet safely.

You'll need to produce a citation for that, as I and thousands of others have done it for decades.

The chamber is cut with a shoulder at a given length (within tolerances) so the case mouth hits that shoulder to stop the case from going in deeper.

As Libertarian David Bergland once commented, "Utopia is a place where everyone has everything they want and nothing ever goes wrong. Utopia is not one of the options." Many handguns, 1911's in particular, are put together with fairly rough fitting parts. It's very easy to get one that has more room in the chamber than the length of cases within spec can reach. These cartridges are stopped by the rim finding the extractor hook before they get there. I don't have a sense of how common this is in other pistols, but I've worked on a lot of 1911's and found this happening in at least half of them.

If you roll crimp a 45 case it will either not fire or it will cause wear when the round is expanded below the chamber and the mouth of the cartridge is squeezing the bullet to get it to exit the case and go down the bore.

Go take a look at the old NRA technical information from the 50's and 60's. You'll find a lot of the top shooters of that era roll-crimped their ammo and swore that produced the best accuracy. (They didn't have taper crimp dies commonly back then, so light roll crimps were needed to remove case flare, but some experimented with taking it further. They were doing it for revolvers using half moon clips anyway.) It's the start pressure, again. There are photos of it in those old articles. The trick is that the extractor hook stopped the case from going forward far enough to jam that rolled crimp against the throat.
 
To quote a usually reliable source (Me!) I did not say anything about headspacing on the case mouth. "Back when I only owned one .45, I loaded SWCs to "headspace" on the shoulder."

MY old technical information from the 1960s, probably the same article rodfac mentions, shows where Mr Dinan recommended a hard roll crimp into the lead of the front band of a semiwadcutter. OAL was controlled to put the shoulder of the SWC against the lands. His headspacing was definitely not off the extractor or the case mouth.

Rules are different for jacketed bullets, as said, they are hard and stiff enough to stand a little jump.
Also a fully accurized 1911 will have been fitted with a short chambered barrel. The final ream to low end of "headspace" is done after the hood length is established. So the jump ain't much.

I taper crimped a lot of .45s on the old Rockchucker by running them into the mouth of the sizing die. Bullets were hand cast Lyman 452460s by a friend and I was glad to pay a nickel a pop for his troubles.
 
Thank you all for taking your time to contribute to this thread and answer mine and other's questions.

It's a pleasure reading posts on this forum, they are usually full of fact and thorough explanation....not just guess work or opinion.

Unclenick, as always, the information you offer to reloaders is priceless!

Thanks all!
 
After all that, I hope you try it at least with a starting load.

using a Lyman 452460, 3.5 grains of bullsyse, a Wilsons match barrel fitted, I was getting the accuracy I wanted. Shot tens of thousands of those rounds indoors @ 50 feet and outdoors @ 25 and 50 yards.

David
 
Jim,

I thought you meant the chamber shoulder, not the bullet shoulder. Sorry for the confusion.

Yes, using both roll crimp and headspacing on the bullet produces the highest start pressure combination. A lot of us moved over to the taper crimp, not because of trying to headspace on the shoulder, but to put off case mouths splitting and then having to toss the brass earlier, as the roll crimp causes. But it never produced equal start pressure.

If anyone has a copy of the old NRA book, Handloading, you find on page 66 a photo of the barrel hood with the case flush with it, as I put in position 3 on my drawing (counting from the left). It was shown in response to a question from a fellow with a match accurized 1911. In those days we still built up the hoods and link lugs on standard barrels by welding filler metal onto them, and then filed and scraped them until the fit was right. Extending the hood made the chamber longer. The fellow asking the question listed on page 66 had a chamber that was 0.9176" from the back end of the hood, which is too long for headspacing on the mouth of a case that is 0.8980", much less one that is 0.8920".

If you then go to page 112, where there is an article on .45 Auto loading, it gives both the taper and roll crimp, stating either is acceptable, but the bullet it illustrates the roll crimp with has a crimp groove used and not enough metal from there to the bullet shoulder to reach the lands in a long chambered gun. This is the kind of setup that is headspacing on the extractor hook, and it was very common, just not optimal. Optimal requires starting with a short chambered barrel, fitting it, then reaming to final headspace.

From an accuracy standpoint, the main thing is to get the bullet bearing surface at leas a short way into the throat for alignment. Contact with the throat by a lead bullet also helps provide some additional resistance for the firing pin blow.
 
Back
Top