In general- no.
And not meaning to sound unsympathetic, but Ruger won't modify a gun to meet "special needs" (to use the nearest applicable terminology).
If you can't use a Ruger product, you just can't use it.
The SP has a notoriously harder-cocking spring set-up, it's the nature of the beast.
Ruger won't do custom work on it to accommodate those who can't handle those springs.
They won't re-design the action, obviously, but they also won't deviate from their specs in terms of installing aftermarket springs or lightening trigger pulls or breaks.
It's the liability thing, and from their viewpoint once they open the floodgates the spill would open up new areas of liability they don't want to deal with.
You may not do anything stupid & blow your foot off with such a Ruger-modified gun, but the guy you sell it to later might, and Ruger (again- not to sound cold-hearted about it) would prefer to lose a few sales on the model among those who find factory specs un-workable than to lose millions in another lawsuit if there's even the possibility of a 5% peripheral attributable company-causation in the design or specs variation by a jury.
They establish specs based on both performance and safety standards.
You & I don't always agree with their specs, but once Ruger establishes them, they hang on for dear life.
One standard set of specs is easier to fight potential court battles on than several individual variations.
In your case, if you can't work the SP, you'll either have to adapt or go with something else.
Denis