I don't really like the look of the hammerless revolvers like the LCR, and yet as I've considered picking up a J-Frame snub recently, I've been thinking of the benefits of having the hammer exposed versus not, and it seems for a snub like the LCR or a similar gun that perhaps it is better to have a hammerless pistol (i'm not sure if "hammerless" is the right term, but you get my meaning).
What are your opinions on the matter? If you have a small J-Frame for potential pocket carry, would you prefer an exposed hammer or no? Would you prefer an option for Single Action? Or is Double Action Only good enough?
Thanks for your upcoming comments!
Lee
What are your opinions on the matter? If you have a small J-Frame for potential pocket carry, would you prefer an exposed hammer or no? Would you prefer an option for Single Action? Or is Double Action Only good enough?
Thanks for your upcoming comments!
Lee