Colt1911forever
Moderator
Aren't you doing that as well?
Not at all. I look at the issue as an employer and a CHP holder. Unlike others here I do not think that the 2nd Amendment is absolute and that it trumps all.
My rights run up against the rights of others all day long. Where there is conflict I attempt to look at the issue from both sides. I try to imagine what the other perspective is bringing to the table.
I am objective. Which is why I can be a CHP holder who also supports the rights of businesses to control who carries on their property. I also think that it is appropriate for a business owner to dictate the terms of employment and an employees actions while representing the company.
I have stated several times that the OP needs to address the change in policy with his company. My objection comes in when people say that the policy change is not legal. I also disagree with those who are crying harassment. No one has been harassed. The OP has been informed of a pending policy change.
People within the gun community need to get rid of the myopic view of all rights as subordinate to gun rights. I see this view on every gun board I am a member of. It is sad that too many people cannot be objective and see the big picture.