MasterPieceArms.com
Moderator
As the federal government continues it's insatiable lust for power, the terms we hear thrown around a lot are "nazi" and "fascist." Curiously, gun owners tend to do comparatively well under fascism. The Nazi weapons law actually loosened some gun restrictions (at least if you were lucky enough to be a "pure blooded" German citizen). We likewise, have seen some loosening of a few federal gun laws (the aw ban expiration even though bush opposed it's demise, and national ccw for some retired govt employees). Also like the Nazi state, there is has been a corresponding yanking of certain rights. Privacy always gets obliterated under fascism. A president who is so drunken with power that he wiretapps without warrants when getting warrants is relatively easy, would have been right at home in 1930s Germany. This time the rights yanking is not so focused against a race. Hitler used a high profile event (the burning of the Reichstag) to make a dangerous power grab with his "enabling act." The German government's official story of who started the Reichstag fire turned out to be completely bogus and only designed to unify the "homeland" under it's leader, and to justify war. Likewise, the U.S. government's official version of 9/11 is so full of nonsense, contradictions, and outright impossibilities that a "commission" was "needed" to ignore most of the evidence and set the government's bogus version in stone. The burning of our Reichstag on 9/11 was immediately used to justify the emotionally named "patriot" act and suspend habeas corpus. Eerily similar to what Hitler did. As if all this wasn't enough, 9/11 was used to justify a war against a NON THREAT nation (Iraq). Poland was no real threat to Adolf either, but amazingly, the "patriotic" Germans went along.
Since most bush supporters just ignore things and call everyone "liberals," "unpatriotic," or "soft on Osama" who oppose "the leader," I really don't expect much from them.
Gun owners have fared fairly well under bush (most of whom that support him sound naively confident when you talk to them), just like most of the German gun owners did. The problem with fascism, is it doesn't stop until the host nation is leveled. I shudder at how many americans arrogantly say "yea, but no one is around to take us down like the allies did to Germany." I forget how few americans are watching as Russia deploys several brand new Topol-M MIRV capable ICBMs every month. I forget that most americans are totally unaware (even though is was front page for a day several years ago) about Russia's city sized bunker under Yamantau mountan that is hardened enough to produce nuclear missiles DURING a war.
There IS one huge difference between 1930s Germany and the U.S. government: Hitler really WAS the man in charge. Bush is plenty arrogant on his own, but it's his globalist handlers that are deeply dangerous to liberty, to this country, and the world.
Since most bush supporters just ignore things and call everyone "liberals," "unpatriotic," or "soft on Osama" who oppose "the leader," I really don't expect much from them.
Gun owners have fared fairly well under bush (most of whom that support him sound naively confident when you talk to them), just like most of the German gun owners did. The problem with fascism, is it doesn't stop until the host nation is leveled. I shudder at how many americans arrogantly say "yea, but no one is around to take us down like the allies did to Germany." I forget how few americans are watching as Russia deploys several brand new Topol-M MIRV capable ICBMs every month. I forget that most americans are totally unaware (even though is was front page for a day several years ago) about Russia's city sized bunker under Yamantau mountan that is hardened enough to produce nuclear missiles DURING a war.
There IS one huge difference between 1930s Germany and the U.S. government: Hitler really WAS the man in charge. Bush is plenty arrogant on his own, but it's his globalist handlers that are deeply dangerous to liberty, to this country, and the world.
