Marko Kloos
Inactive
False dilemma, LightningJoe. There are more choices on the menu.
Well, if you don't like Guiliani, you can always vote for Hillary, I suppose.
Taxes, national security, ethics, gun control, respective supporters, judicial nominees, abortion, the individual vrs. "collective" right to keep and bear arms, MoveOn.Org, spending
The ones in bold are the ones that matter most to me. National security is a given and judges have a long-term impact. A gun ban won't matter with the right judges in place (neither will several other items listed). Given his record in NY, I think he would nominate judges who are less likely to legislate from the bench and would likely find a gun ban unconstitutional. Getting them confirmed is another issue. Unfortunately one of the major issues not listed above, immigration, they appear to be too close for comfort.Taxes, national security, ethics, gun control, respective supporters, judicial nominees, abortion, the individual vrs. "collective" right to keep and bear arms, MoveOn.Org, spending....
Given his record in NY, I think he would nominate judges who are less likely to legislate from the bench and would likely find a gun ban unconstitutional.
Taxes, national security, ethics, gun control, respective supporters, judicial nominees, abortion, the individual vrs. "collective" right to keep and bear arms, MoveOn.Org, spending....but if you like Hillbama, vote for 'em. They have a special plan to ban all semi-auto firearms. Because hunter's don't "need" semi-auto firearms. It'll be a "sensible gun safety" law.
What part of Giulani's record makes you think that his judges would not legislate from the bench
Well now...completely wrong and without merit
Most of Giuliani's 75 judicial appointments during his eight years as mayor of New York were hardly in the model of Chief Justice John Roberts or Samuel Alito -- much less aggressive conservatives in the mold of Antonin Scalia.