bamaranger
New member
Many are likely familiar with Col.(?) Dave Grossman's book "On Killing".
He uses several examples from history to support his pretenses on the subject of taking human life. He comments on the US Civil War and the instances of rifled muskets loaded with multiple charges as indication of troops "going through the motions" of loading and firing, but not willing to actually fire at another person. He also postulates that those actually firing shot over enemy lines intentionally for the same reason. My take on that is though most Civil War troops apparently drilled a lot on firing, they shot very little live fire if at all. You fight as you train is a modern comment, so too your fighting skills deteriorate to the level of your training. My take is the the CW soldier, in line and terrified, went thru the motions of capping, just as he had trained, then cocked and snapped on a bare nipple.....just as he had trained.
Grossman draws other parallels as well, citing that only a percentage of WWII fighter pilots had high "kill" scores further supporting his theories. He fails to discuss the leader and wingman tactics of WWII fighter pilots, where one plane/pilot is the shooter, and wingman is responsible for watching the shooters "six" while on the attack. Thus half an attacking force is responsible for NOT shooting, but watching.
Anyhow, GROSSMAN's book is an interesting read and I'd say recommended to anybody carrying a firearm professionally or for personal defense. But I thought his theories on some of the historical points were a bit flawed and might make for interesting discussion. What say y'all.
He uses several examples from history to support his pretenses on the subject of taking human life. He comments on the US Civil War and the instances of rifled muskets loaded with multiple charges as indication of troops "going through the motions" of loading and firing, but not willing to actually fire at another person. He also postulates that those actually firing shot over enemy lines intentionally for the same reason. My take on that is though most Civil War troops apparently drilled a lot on firing, they shot very little live fire if at all. You fight as you train is a modern comment, so too your fighting skills deteriorate to the level of your training. My take is the the CW soldier, in line and terrified, went thru the motions of capping, just as he had trained, then cocked and snapped on a bare nipple.....just as he had trained.
Grossman draws other parallels as well, citing that only a percentage of WWII fighter pilots had high "kill" scores further supporting his theories. He fails to discuss the leader and wingman tactics of WWII fighter pilots, where one plane/pilot is the shooter, and wingman is responsible for watching the shooters "six" while on the attack. Thus half an attacking force is responsible for NOT shooting, but watching.
Anyhow, GROSSMAN's book is an interesting read and I'd say recommended to anybody carrying a firearm professionally or for personal defense. But I thought his theories on some of the historical points were a bit flawed and might make for interesting discussion. What say y'all.