Well, here is what I tried to send, pending revision to fit under the 1000 character limit:
It has come to my attention that google's advertising policy discriminates against advertising legal firearms due to "innapropriate content" while touting its belief in uncensored freedom of expression. Aside from all other factors, this comes across as at least minimally hypocritical. On another note, I challenge your definitions of what is considered "innapropriate content." While sites that offer firearms and ammunition are censored, and told that their accounts will be suspended as long as they reference firearms,
searches for porn, a__l, b__j_b and d__bl_ p___tra___n return numerous sponsored links. I assume that this means google supports pornography, as these sites are apparently appropriate. Again along these lines, I searched for papers, term papers, and essays, and numerous sponsored links turned up advertising "custom" papers with discreet service and delivery "in as early as 6 hours." This can only lead me to reason that google supports academic dishonesty as this is not deemed "innapropriate content." I use google often and am truly saddened to find that your service, which I consider a valuable tool, censors legal sales of firearms and ammunition, while passing much more questionable content on. I can only ask that this unbalanced method of website approval be remedied as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Adam Zimmerman
I will revise this to make it fit, but I was wondering if anyone knows of a mailing address I can submit an expanded version of this to.
Might as well send it more than one way.