My argument is...
... that unless there are other reasons to go with the revolver, that I generally prefer an auto due to:
a) higher capacity (usually);
b) faster reload capability (I'm much faster with magazine changes than I am with speed strips or speed-loaders);
c) ease of shooting (typically less perceived recoil with the auto in any given caliber / power range).
Reasons that I might give the nod to the revolver would include:
a) possibility of needing to change power levels on ammo (.38+P in my lady's GP100 on the nightstand, but .357 180gr Buffalo Bore when used as a woods gun);
b) ability to leave it loaded without worrying about magazine springs (again, great for the nightstand gun);
c) ability to feed any bullet contour (but then again, many semi-autos can feed large HP cavity bullets well, one just has to test for reliability).
d) in rare cases, where the user has trouble with their grip, and can't work the slide of an SD caliber auto but can manage to hold onto an SD caliber revolver (note: my mother actually has an easier time with a P239 than with a small revolver; she can work the slide on the P239, although she had trouble with other 9mm autos; she does not like, and has trouble controlling, the recoil of a .38 snub).
I definitely don't recommend AGAINST an auto because it holds more rounds, or reloads faster.
I also don't recommend in favor of a revolver due to its "simplicity." (It really isn't that hard to learn to work the controls of an auto, nor to learn to clear stoppages - if a shooter doesn't want to put in that much effort, they probably shouldn't be trusted with a revolver either).
... that unless there are other reasons to go with the revolver, that I generally prefer an auto due to:
a) higher capacity (usually);
b) faster reload capability (I'm much faster with magazine changes than I am with speed strips or speed-loaders);
c) ease of shooting (typically less perceived recoil with the auto in any given caliber / power range).
Reasons that I might give the nod to the revolver would include:
a) possibility of needing to change power levels on ammo (.38+P in my lady's GP100 on the nightstand, but .357 180gr Buffalo Bore when used as a woods gun);
b) ability to leave it loaded without worrying about magazine springs (again, great for the nightstand gun);
c) ability to feed any bullet contour (but then again, many semi-autos can feed large HP cavity bullets well, one just has to test for reliability).
d) in rare cases, where the user has trouble with their grip, and can't work the slide of an SD caliber auto but can manage to hold onto an SD caliber revolver (note: my mother actually has an easier time with a P239 than with a small revolver; she can work the slide on the P239, although she had trouble with other 9mm autos; she does not like, and has trouble controlling, the recoil of a .38 snub).
I definitely don't recommend AGAINST an auto because it holds more rounds, or reloads faster.
I also don't recommend in favor of a revolver due to its "simplicity." (It really isn't that hard to learn to work the controls of an auto, nor to learn to clear stoppages - if a shooter doesn't want to put in that much effort, they probably shouldn't be trusted with a revolver either).