I was just wondering why did Glock ever constructed a faulty barrel design? Jarvis and Barsto have all reliable feeding, even if it has a more tighter cahmber than glock barrels. (.427 vs .432 expanded cases of .40). Dont get me wrong I too have a G22, but Im scared to fire lots of rounds in it, whether lead or factory ammunition. There are KBs with 1911s, .45 guns, but not as much happening as with the glock .40 guns. And I too understand that they are also using lead ammo. Why is glock more prone, I wish they did not even made this polygonal rifling that will eventually cost you your gun or even your life in an event of a KB. I paray that they will address this problem soon. They can be sued in court because of this unsupported barrels. Kindly help me with this guys. THANKS A LOT!!!!
------------------
"Onwards toward Full Supported Barrels in Glock .40"
------------------
"Onwards toward Full Supported Barrels in Glock .40"