Really?
You would think that being a mechanical engineer and having about 15 years of practical experience with semiautomatic pistols would have taught me the "dynamics of firing a handgun." Gosh!
Granted that the recoiling mass must have something to provide resistance, and that the shooter may absorb some amount of the energy of the recoiling mass -- varying amounts, even, depending on how it's held. But does ANYONE know that the slide isn't reaching it's full rearward travel in this case? What makes you think so? The short-stroking theory is just that, a theory. And I don't think that happens in a pistol that remains in the shooter's hand, at least not with a stock recoil spring. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, I'll be happy to admit my mistake.
The "you're holding it wrong" argument is just a cover used by lazy manufacturers to shift the blame elsewhere for their design problems. Would you buy a wristwatch that wouldn't keep time if you were "wearing it wrong?"
But we are not helping the original poster with this debate, are we? I say have an experienced shooter try it (apparently already done) -- what then, if it keeps malfunctioning (apparently it has)? I say return it to Glock under warranty.