Did we really talk somebody out of buying another pistol? I think that's against policy!
OK, back to serious. Armed, you already have a Shield. That makes a great all-around carry pistol, especially with a spare magazine and a couple different holsters to suit the mode of dress for the day.
Now if you were looking for something to carry in place of the G-22 on the days you want to bring that out, the G-19/23 is definitely worth a look. I've had 2 Gen 3 G-26s (notice past tense) and just traded the second one for a Gen 4 G-19. The "compact" frame size Glock is great so far. Plenty big enough to shoot well, small enough to be much more carry-friendly than the full-size model (I have a Gen 3 G-17 also) and it holds plenty of rounds. I never really found the G-26 to be as ultra-concealable as some suggest. The grip is less like to print, yes, but the end of the slide tends to be more noticeable on my body, and the thickness is the same. On the highlights though, within 10-15 yards the sub-compact Glock is as practically shootable as the full-size models. I only really noticed an accuracy difference when doing things like head-shots on IDPA silhouettes from 25 yards or trying to connect on targets from 50-yards.
(My next interest for a carry-size Glock is the 42. I have a friend who has one and thinks it's the second greatest Glock ever, the greatest Glock ever being the 19.)
OK, back to serious. Armed, you already have a Shield. That makes a great all-around carry pistol, especially with a spare magazine and a couple different holsters to suit the mode of dress for the day.
Now if you were looking for something to carry in place of the G-22 on the days you want to bring that out, the G-19/23 is definitely worth a look. I've had 2 Gen 3 G-26s (notice past tense) and just traded the second one for a Gen 4 G-19. The "compact" frame size Glock is great so far. Plenty big enough to shoot well, small enough to be much more carry-friendly than the full-size model (I have a Gen 3 G-17 also) and it holds plenty of rounds. I never really found the G-26 to be as ultra-concealable as some suggest. The grip is less like to print, yes, but the end of the slide tends to be more noticeable on my body, and the thickness is the same. On the highlights though, within 10-15 yards the sub-compact Glock is as practically shootable as the full-size models. I only really noticed an accuracy difference when doing things like head-shots on IDPA silhouettes from 25 yards or trying to connect on targets from 50-yards.
(My next interest for a carry-size Glock is the 42. I have a friend who has one and thinks it's the second greatest Glock ever, the greatest Glock ever being the 19.)