Generally accepted sweet-spot distance to the lands.

Tipsy, I've no rule of thumb to correlate jump and increase of powder charge to maintain velocity before pressure increases unsafely as I get closer to the lands.

My only experience with such stuff at longer ranges was shooting the same 7.62 NATO match or .308 Win. commercial match loads across four Garand barrels where cartridge OAL stayed the same and the throat advanced several hundredths of an inch over its accurate life. Bullet drop differences at 600 and 1000 yards across that much throat erosion was not enough to mandate a significant elevation zero change to compensate for velocity changes. At 600 yards, a 150 fps velocity difference means almost a 3 MOA change in elevation zero; at 1000, it's a 6 MOA change. I never observed that much change in zero over the life of the barrels as their throats advanced. Perhaps 1 MOA, at most.

Meanwhile, back to throat erosion measurements. It's been a long time standard for 30 caliber Garand and M14 barrels that their throat erosion gauge advances 1/10th inch further into the origin of the rifling for every 1000 rounds of barrel life. The gauge head's .3000" diameter at its tip and an inch back, it's .3100" diameter. That's .0010" diameter change for every 1/10th inch of length. After 3000 rounds in the 7.62 NATO Garand barrels I've worn out, the gauge read 3 numbers higher than it did when new; accuracy was degraded enough to not be good for top level competition. At 5000 rounds, it read 5 higher; the limit for lower level competitions and that's when the military shops supporting match grade rifles rebarreled them. "10" was the reading limit for regular service rifles at about 10,000 rounds.

Due to the gauge's taper differing than that of bullets ogive's .308" diameter down to .300", that's why the gauge will go in further than bullets for a given dimensional change at the origin of the rifling.
 
Last edited:
I started digging, then changed my mind. For a moment I thought someone was going to quote Weatherby.

In the old days there were a few reloaders that were thinkers. The 300 Winchester mag. had a short neck, today there is a lot of blah, blah and blah, back then the neck was short because of the 30/06. If the 30/06 worked, the 300 Win Mag was not too long. The thinkers extended the throat of the 300 Win mag. chamber and then moved the bullet out by forming long cases. One in particular used 300 Weatherby data for his 300 Win Mag loadings.

Back then there was a question: 'WHY?' Paranoia kicked in. The logic answer was they fixed it so owners of the Weatherby had to use Weatherby ammo or reloaders had to load the rounds short to feed.

The short feed ammo prevented the reloader from loading the ammo long and sticking the bullet into the lands. Weathery loads were hot, sticking the bullet into the lands was a bad habit.

then there is that story about the man what was using a certain brand of glasses and the other shooter/tester, he was testing scopes when a rifle came apart on him. Seems he was using an Eddystone M1917.
 
....or around 175,000 rounds each
For that many rounds of 22 rimfire barrel life to make me a believer, I need data showing Eley's 50 m/yd test groups with their best match ammo are no bigger than 6/10ths MOA. Barrel life numbers without accuracy references are meaningless.
 
Bart B: Call Eley. They've been at this a while, and no doubt keep records...like Sierra. But at this moment, I cannot direct you to the particular issue and author of the article in PS magazine.
 
Back
Top