Game over for the 40 S&W. Say it ain't so!

W

Wethepeople01

New member
I spent ten+ years on the job working for a great township PD in the Midwest. My LE career ended as a result of injuries sustained from being hit by a drunk driver while off duty. I always favored the .40 S&W round and carried a Glock 22 on duty. I live in the West now and our local gun shops DO NOT STOCK .40 cal weapons and stock a minimum of the ammo on the shelves. I carry a Springfield XDS 9mm during the warm weather months, but would like to step up the size and caliber of my EDC during cold weather months. Too much local talk about the 'dying .40 cal' for my tastes. I would love a recommendation or two for a concealable .40 to meet my needs. Also, should I consider the .45 over the .40? What would you recommend then?
 
.40 S&W is EVERYWHERE around here and it's cheap. Maybe your LGS are just going though a dry spell. There are lots of places you can order on line in the meantime. I'd sure hate for you to shy away from a chambering you're comfortable with when you might not have to.

Personally, I don't think the .45 offers anymore protection than a .40, it doesn't offer any less either.:p They're both great rounds in my opinion and very affordable to shoot. That said, I carry a 9 because it suits my needs better than either but not because I think it's any better holistically.
 
this is an interesting topic. first let me start off by saying I am a big fan of meeting tasks with the right tool for the job. if I go out firewood cutting I'm going to borrow a 3/4 ton from a family member rather than take my little dodge dakota out, if I'm recommending a computer to a customer I never recommend a tablet when either a smart phone or laptop can do the job better and if I need a handgun for a specific purpose and my options are high capacity or stopping power I recommend 9mm and 45ACP accordingly. 40 has always seemed like a compromise to me.

with that said, I have noticed no shift whatsoever in the number of 40 ammo on the shelves or the handgun offerings in the cases where I am, but I have noticed that the majority of handguns that are being sold private party all seem to be 40 so maybe there is some truth to 40 losing popularity but definitely not dying any time in the next decade.

I personally carry 9mm more than not, but that's more due to the fact that my 45s are harder to conceal. when I open carry I always gravitate toward the 45 because... well I like my 45s more, and they are better suited to 4 legged bad guys than the 9mms.
 
I used to be a 45 fan way back when but now it's 9mm exclusively for my SD handguns. I've owned 40 calibers but never cared for them. When I wanted something with more punch I went with 357 Sig.
 
Wethepeople01 said:
Also, should I consider the .45 over the .40? What would you recommend then?
Click to expand...

"IMHO" .45ACP works better for me than .40S&W, I'd highly recommend the Gen4 Glock 21 and the HK45, and I have both.
 
Too much local talk about the 'dying .40 cal' for my tastes. I would love a recommendation or two for a concealable .40 to meet my needs.
Click to expand...

XD subcompact.

Also, should I consider the .45 over the .40? What would you recommend then?
Click to expand...

You can. Probably wont make that much difference in the long run.

Too much local talk about the 'dying .40 cal' for my tastes.
Click to expand...

More for the rest of us.
 
Thank you my new friends. 9mm balistic performance has certainly improved. This is the argument that some make - that the gap has narrowed between the 9mm, .40 & .45. But, this is illogical. With the use of modern bullets and propellants- certainly balistic performance has improved across the board! Also, not all LE agencies have transitioned back to the 9mm. There are plenty of us who have relied up on the .40 S&W in self defense situations without feeling inadequately armed, trained and prepared. The round is a true performer AND it still allows for capacity. I'll take the .40 over the 9mm in the right platform any day. I prefer a magazine capacity of ten (9+1) or more. Barrel length of at least 3.5 inches for the larger cal. And, a three finger grip. This rules out the G27 for me. The G23 is a contender. Also, Sig P320c, FNS 40c, Springfield XDM C. Should I also consider the M&P Compact for cold weather carry (trigger issues?)?
Thanks!
 
In my opinion "it ain't so". It seems a lot of LE agencies are dumping them as trade-ins. They are going to many of us at great prices from some outstanding gun manufactures like Sig Sauer, Glock, and S&W.

I grabbed a Sig P229 in great condition for $415.00. Then also scored a 357 Sig barrel and have a dual caliber pistol by simply exchanging the barrels. A quick 20 second change over. Then you can also use the same magazines. It takes as long to load a 12 round magazine as it does to change the barrels.

There will be plenty of these police trade-ins around for many years. There will also be plenty of spare parts.

Reloading the .40 S&W and the 357 Sig rounds are a cinch with plenty of reloading components available. Since the .40 and 357 were LEO rounds, there is plenty of inexpensive once fired brass available from training and practice ranges.
 
I disagree that the performance of a .40 over a 9mm is significant...because I think it's more about shot placement than it is caliber now with the high quality 9mm defense ammo out there ....but it's your carry gun - and you should carry whatever you want.

But I got sucked into the .40 s&w craze too....with Sig ....and in a smaller gun, easy to conceal I still have a Sig 239 in .40 / and I think the sig 239 is still a good option for a very solid single stack carry gun ( I don't carry them often, but I have one in 9 & one in .40 )...

I even bought a Wilson combat full sized all stainless Protector model in .40 S&W 8 or 9 yrs ago ( I still have other Wilson's in 9mm and .45acp).....and while I shot it a little, it got left out over time....so I sold it to an acquaintance that lusted for it ..../ and I don't miss it.

For yrs I thought the only thing I would ever carry was a 5" Wilson in .45acp ( a CQB that I still love, but with some arthritis now in hands as I move into my late 60's ) i'm carrying a Wilson 5" in 9mm now....i'm a little quicker on follow-up shots with the 9mm...and I shoot it a lot...

So i've evolved on the ---- it had to be a .45acp !! ( in a 1911 of course )...

I do think the gun sales in .40 have slowed way down based on what gun shop owners tell me locally.....and while it's an in between caliber in my view / I know it still has a long term following and I don't think it's going away.

Good luck in your search..../ to me, my primary carry will always be a 1911....in whatever caliber you like / great triggers, great ergonomics....I may go to a 4" or a 4.25" in an alloy frame someday ( when I get old...)...but it will always be a Wilson Combat ...and probably a 9mm....
 
Last edited:
IMO, 40 is a great round in something like a XD40 or maybe a Kahr P40. The P40 is on the line for too small and light for me.

I traded my P40 for a CZ75B 40 and really like it. Of course that was also a trade for a range gun from a CCW gun. My DW CCO has had to take up the slack!
 
I've been tempted to buy a 40 just because every time I shoot a 9mm or 45, the guy at my range who sweeps up my brass and dumps it in my range bag, give me a crapper load of 40 brass along with it.

Seems a shame to throw it away. ;)
 
I've got a 96 Beretta and 40 S&W light weight bullet loads approach the much respected 125gr 357 magnum in ballistic performance. Like some others have said just more for us 40 fans.
I also see nothing wrong with 9mm or 45ACP, each has their use.
And since when is "compromise" such a bad thing?
 
I was around when the 40 came out and really was never a fan, it was an answer to a question that I never asked. The 9mm really got the short end in the fallout from the Miami shootout, but we all have benefited from ammo advancement. The gap is still there between 9, 40 and 45 and sure it's small one, the likelihood that it will matter is remote but so is the likelihood of the 16 or 17th round being your savior.
That being said I'm happy that folks are jumping off the bandwagon. With the current glut of LEO trades and new closeout 40s I have now bought 4 40s (actually 5 but sold the G23) and a good supply of FBI overrun Ranger ammo for great prices.
The G23 started it I got a LNIB LEO trade with 3 mags and night sights for under 400 try as I could Glock's ergonomics just don't work for me, so it was sold and I ordered a LEO trade in Sig P229 ($529 with both short reach and short reset kit 4 mags and night sights) a new FN FNS ($414 with night sights and 3 mags) from Bud's on the same day, I've since added a Walther PPS ($329) and a XDm 5.25 ($539) all 4 were well less than the current price of their 9mm parts
 
How about just using what ever is the most available and affordable?
It isn't like there's a huge or even significant difference with the typical handgun calibers is there?
Isn't it more about the shooter than the gun anyway?
 
It ain't so. I see lots of .40s used by cops around here. Armored car guards to. And a friend who just got a CHL/LTC said .40 was the round of choice at the qualifications (and he got a Glock 23 for carry.)

Deaf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top