FYI: 60 Minutes segment on police snipers.

Darsten, I for one always have problems figuring out some of the reasons for some of the bells and whistles folks put on or into their rifles, and why some things cost so much.

Some of it may well be a Zen thing. If you believe it will help, it will indeed help. If a higher cost helps you believe, all well and good.

For sure, though, limited production items with lots of hand labor and a lot of testing are going to cost much more than even a "basic" custom rifle.

And then we have the fun of arguing about it.

:), Art
 
Kudos to Art

Art, I fully expected to see the next thing you posted to say: "Steve, check your e-mail"

Much thanks for not being the "Thought Police." We all have our own ideas about personal responsibility and liberty (they go hand in hand) and that affects our feelings about "authority figures." Again, thanks for not being heavy handed with any of us "radicals." We like it here.
 
Good call Erick.

I guess now our policemen are self-proclaimed Judge, Jury, and Executioner rolled into one "high speed/low drag" badass package.
 
I think it is being used out of context.

"some people need to be shot." You could interpret that as, "That damn El Rojo. He ought to be shot as service to society" or you can think of it as "El Rojo has a gun to that little girls head and he needs to be shot in order to preserve the innocent little girl's life." Of course the latter will not be CBS's intent.
 
El Rojo, I think it's the other way 'round. Since the media is biased toward gov't control, I doubt that they would show anything negative. More of a "We've got it under control" propeganda show. Just a guess. I'm going to sleep now. G'night.
 
Yikes, I'm not even going to get into this big flame war. I do have a problem with one of the other replies saying that was bashing the cops using an armored vehicle as cover instead of engaging the targets. Well, let me think...mmmmmmmmmmmmmm...all the firearms training classes and officer survival schools I have been through seemed to stress cover as a very important factor. Also, the idea of rushing in and being another dead victim did not help the situation at all. Now, I do remember my first year in LE I was first on a scene of a home invasion in progress with three armed guys inside the house. I was in NO damn hurry to rush in that house. I remember parking several houses down and taking cover behind a big fat tree and waiting for the back up to arrive. I am one to never judge a situation that I was not there. How can anyone armchair quarterback a stressful situation that was not there??? Every situation is unique and different. Heck, I work for an LE agency that won't even allow us to carry slugs for our shotguns.

[Edited by jadams951 on 01-30-2001 at 03:30 AM]
 
I'd love to work for a department that could AFFORD an 8000.00 rig. never seen one owned by a department. As to the 30-30 comment, I do not accept your answer. Either you can or cannot SAFELY make that shot with iron sights. I wouldn't try.....

SRT/SWAT wear BDUs for a couple of reasons.
1) Easier to move in and far more comfortable than knit pants, a shirt with lots of pretty brass plates and pins, and shiny black Chlorophrams. I can't remember how many of those goof suits I tore up on patrol. BDUs are more functional.
2) Yes, they provide a psychological advantage. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I'd rather scare someone into giving up rather than have to shoot them....
 
It's sad how quickly some of you judge people and situations you have never and probably will never be in. All you can do is sit back and arm chair quarterback after an incident is completed.

Yes police do make errors. Yes police are not perfect.

I'll I know is if my loved one was a hostage and the Police Marksman has the shot, I hope he has the BEST WEAPON SYSTEM money can buy. We as the public should support ANY measure that saves lives.

I thought that TFL was a cut above, I am wrong.

YES LEGALHACK I'M TALKING TO YOU!
 
You guys misread my post. I worry more about spending 10K on a weapons system and then running these idjits through some nickel and dime school to "certify" them as "snipers". My experience with LEA's is that they are a bunch of well-intentioned people who mean to do well. My fear is the "atmosphere" in which they do their training is not conducive to adherence of basic civil rights for the populace.

Tossing a bunch of ninja gear at kids and then hyping them up with some run-and-shoot school and then unleashing them on the population is not my idea of what law enforcement is about in a democracy.

Don't slander me with your war stories. I spent way too many days at Mott Lake for you to question my creds.
 
Legalhack your analogies suck. Credentials or not you should know better. Civil rights? How about victims rights?
What about the public's right to live without threat. I have a feeling you're enjoying this attention. Too bad with all of your "Credentials and Vast Experience" you don't know what you're speaking of.

It must be easy to put price tags on everything when you know you can never be physically involved.

Watch you don't get stuck between those cushions Quarterback!
 
I see smoke...........

Gentlemen, gentlemen,

Holy smokes. I had no idea when I started this thread that it was going to turn into such a roast. I was merely attempting to spread the word about a TV news story that might be interesting to people who frequent TFL. My fault though; I guess I should have seen the potential for it to go off on a tangent. :D

What if we give some post show opinions when it is all said and done? Now that could offer some lively discussions, eh?

Regards,


kgs.
 
Butch 48, you are right. I no longer put myself into these situations. Your analogy to quarterbacking is correct as well. Trying not to be critical of law enforcement, but am slightly concerned about where the last eight years have taken us. Will not argue with you on this as I think we most likely see things the same way. Tossed out some thoughts for contemplation, not looking for an argument. I am secure with who I am and my creds. Won't argue that with you. LEA's have my 100% total support, just worry about the training regimen. Hopefully, with the new administration, we won't have any more WACO's, Ruby-Ridge's, Elian's, etc. Having "counseled" some of the players at WACO, I fear the power of unchecked government.

Will get off my soapbox and as I said originally - will let the professionals handle these matters. Won't argue with you, you are correct. I ride a desk these days.
 
The last 8 years and law enforcement...

Try really really hard to remember that there is still a little bit of good, old fashioned federalism (as in, seperation of powers between state/local and federal levels) in the 'justice system.'

Quite a few local agencies have been sued by the feds for not caving in to the USDOJ's demands that the locals do business the feds' way.

Just a thought,
Mike

PS Trivia Time: Who did the FOP endorse in this last presidential race, and why? ;)
 
CBS News | 60 Minutes II
http://cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,267184-412,00.shtml

Are guns to blame for workplace
and school violence? Arm yourself
with the facts.

Albuquerque Police Chief
Gerald Galvin explains that
the crisis intervention team
does that the SWAT team
cannot do: "talk and talk and
delay the application of force."


Correspondent Jim Stewart goes behind
the scenes at sniper school.


The Sniper
SWAT Teams Grow In Number
Their Skill Relies On Precise Training
But Some Question If There Are Better Policing Alternatives

Jan. 30, 2001
(CBS) When you need help, you
dial 911. Street cops in need of
help call for the SWAT team. And
when things get really ugly, the
SWAT team turns to its sniper.
The sniper has become the
favorite secret weapon in more
and more police departments.

But some wonder whether simply
having a sniper on the force
makes a department more likely
to use one. Who are these
people? What sets them apart?
60 Minutes II Correspondent Jim Stewart reports.

At Thunder Ranch in Mountain Home, Texas, a multi-purpose gun
school, veteran police officers learn in an intense five-day course
the deadly specialty of being a sniper.

They learn how and when to fire a weapon with great precision from
a great distance to take another life.

"The snipers are kind of like the Air Force," says Clint Smith, the
course director. "They stand off a little bit. They get to hit stuff.
They don't really kind of have to get dirty, and I don't mean that
ugly. But there's a detachment from it a little bit."

You could call the snipers the cruise missile of police forces. But as
Smith explains, "The problem with the cruise missile is it has no
conscience. And what we need is someone who either has one
or will assume the role of having one after they press the
trigger."

The core of what Smith teaches his sniper is how to deal with a
hostage situation. The central focus: how to take down the hostage
taker.

Many police departments beefed up their SWAT teams in the 1980s
and added more snipers for such difficult moments.

Thirteen-year veteran Steve Rodriguez was in place in Albuquerque,
N.M., as police responded to an armed bank robbery in progress.
Looking through the scope, Rodriguez could see someone with
dark hair, sunglasses, in a suit, and holding a woman by the arm,
he recalls.

Rodriguez's target was smaller than a softball. But Rodriguez
managed to center the man in his sights and squeeze the rifle
trigger.

He fired two times and missed. Rodriguez had failed to adjust his
rifle scope, sending his bullets slamming into a concrete wall.

Rodriguez says he fired the third shot and hit the target at the top of
his head, exactly where he had been aiming.

Was this a close call?

Rodriguez says that based on his training, skills and abilities, he
could pull it off, but maybe not everyone could.

But should one person be in a position to make such a judgment?

One of Smith's first instructions to students is that there are shots
that can't be made. He has a drill to illustrate how shooting at a
moving gunman could mean death for a hostage.

In one Alabama incident, a hostage took a fatal sniper's bullet
meant for her captor. Because of this and other mistakes, a police
sniper is taught first to trust the negotiators to do their jobs. But
sometimes there is no time.

"There's a famous phrase that you pray for peace and prepare
for war," says Brett. "And I don't think that it's something that
you're looking forward to. But you have to be prepared to, if you
have to take a life."

The notion of preparing for war, however, bothers Gerald Galvin,
chief of the Albuquerque Police Department. Recently SWAT teams
and snipers have become increasingly popular even among small
police departments.

"You get to carry an automatic weapon," Galvin says. "You get to
put camouflage on. And it's some in some departments."

Indeed the snipers can look like a little army, dressed in black with
Kevlar helmets and boots.

"That's really contradictory to what the mission of the police
departments in this country are all about. We're policing our own
people. We're not at war with our people," Galvin says.

Before Galvin took over, Albuquerque had been criticized for an
unusally high number of police-involved shootings. Steve
Rodriguez's career alone included five instances of shooting his
weapon, involving the killing of four people. On one cold December
night, he was told a baby's life was in danger; her father was
threatening to toss her over the side of a bridge spanning the Rio
Grand.

"And so we busted two roadblocks, diversions, to get people off
the freeway," Rodriguez says. "I started running."

"I had about 65 pounds of personal gear on my body, with body
armor, ammunition, things like that," he recalls. "Then I had about
another 20, 25 pounds of rifle and bag."

Rodriguez ran half a mile through stalled traffic and took up position
behind a parked police cruiser. He had no way to communicate with
other officers. He just went on instinct.

By the time he arrived on the bridge, he thought things were falling
apart. egotiations appeared to have failed. One officer was walking
away. He pulled out his sniper rifle and looked through the scope
and thought, "It's up to me; it's now or never."

"While the man was holding the baby over the edge of the
precipice, there's nothing we can do," he explains. "Once he
brings it back to our side of the bridge, if I can get a central
nervous system hit, and he falls straight down,...then the baby will
not fall over the edge."

He didn't see the man holding a weapon - just the baby over the
edge, he says. Nor had anyone told him that the man had a
weapon.

"It was about 90 seconds from the time I saw him till the time I
fired the shot," Rodriguez says.

It was a direct hit. The man died instantly. The baby survived.

No one had told him it was not possible to talk this man off the
bridge, according to Rodriguez. Nor was he told: We give up. You
take the shot.

"The time was compressed far too much for that," he says.

The victim's family didn't think so and sued. But a jury eventually
decided in Rodriguez's favor, concluding the shooting was justified.

Rodriguez never had a doubt that he did the right thing, he says.

At the time of that incident, the Albuquerque SWAT team had been
averaging more than one death a year - far more than the rate in
cities of a comparable size. When Galvin became the Albuquerque
police chief, he was under pressure to change things. He sharply
minimized the SWAT team's role, making use of a different team.

Galvin explains that the crisis intervention team does that the SWAT
team cannot do: "talk and talk and delay the application of force."

Some within the sniper world
tolerate talk only to a point.
Rodriguez, who recently left the
Albuquerque Police Department, is
one of its prime disciples. He's
now teaching that approach as a
part-time instructor at Thunder
Ranch.

"The goal is always to talk them
out," he says. "The goal is always
to not have anyone injured or killed. I think what you start to reach
in that gray area is how much risk are you going to allow the
hostages to remain in on the hopes of you will have a negotiated
settlement."

No one knows how many have died at the hands of police snipers.
But when it comes to learning the trade, there is a well-known rule:
Be prepared to take a life to save a life.

"Everybody says, 'When you fire your weapon, somebody's going
to die,'" Rodriguez says. "That's not correct. When I fire a
weapon, somebody's going to live. That may be through the death
of somebody else, but that's a far removed change from Lord
High Executioner."

Copyright MMI Viacom Internet Services Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Butch48, did not mean to slander you - you have all our support. I probably should not have stated my views so passionately in the light that CBS will most likely run to the extreme in their portrayal. Sorry 'bout that. I too hope that CBS doesn't do what it usually does and should have quieted down until after the show.

Just have some experience in the arena of the locals lying to the fed heavy-hitters trying to get them involved in what should be a purely local operation. Keep tossing the B-S flag and we'll all learn a little.

Keep safe.......
 
I believe the show was fair! The Chief from New Mexico must be under huge amounts of political pressure. I hope that atmosphere doesn't get any innocents dead. Was that the dumbest BG at the bank or what? Did you hear that? There it is again!

I train hard, very hard, as do all of my teammates, to protect the interests of innocent people, the people we serve daily without any reservations.

I am passionate about what I believe in but, I do understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Support Your Local Police.
Support the N.R.A.
 
Steve,
Iron sights @ 100yds with a moving gunman shielded by a hostage, Please.
Only if your scope failed and you were the only one, and the gunman was standing perfectly still, and you knew the gunman was about to shoot and....
Yeah, it’s highly possible not probable, certainly not as likely when using optics.
Of course you know why using a scope is preferable to iron sights in most situations.
So your kidding, right.
Otherwise it's the same macho BS you castigate the police for.

Art is spot-on.
 
Back
Top