Keeping a gun you found without seeking it's owner is no different than a wallet or a bag of money.
I'm not suggesting that - I'm suggesting that the finder turn the gun in, and if its unclaimed and not found to be used in a crime, it should be returned to the finder if he/she wants to keep it.
This covers the moral aspect of due diligence in attempting to locate its rightful owner.
In general, I think if something is just found laying there on the ground, and it doesn’t have numbers or some other way of locating its owner, it should be deemed fair for the keeping if the law permits.
Donate it to charity if you want, but for those of you who think that found items are not yours to keep, bear in mind that it is not yours to give away either.
lcpiper said:
There are entire nations of people who do not set the same standard or acknowledge your principles....
Frank Ettin said:
So what?
1. We're here and not in some other country.
2. That ethical standards of other cultures might be different from mine does not require that I abandon mine.
Frank Ettin said:
It's a sort of viewpoint that really doesn't do humans proud.
Frank, you referenced humans, not American's specifically. The geographic bets are off.
Honestly, I think there is entirely too much self-righteousness and judgment of others in this thread.
We're not talking about stealing things, we're talking about keeping a found item (within the rule of law) after effort has been made to find its owner and its free of crime.
There is absolutely nothing morally bankrupt about that.