Don't interpret my remarks as a "touch my door and die" attitude, its not. It's a "don't waste time worrying about why the ax wielder is there, when he is swinging the ax at you" attitude.
So i ask that yes you give a chance to any intruder..
No, I don't think so. Since "any" includes "every", and could range from the mistaken drunk to a weapon firing jihadist, I will not agree to that blanket statement.
Breaking down my door in the middle of the night (or in daylight) is NOT a friendly act. It demonstrates the intruders capacity and capability for violence.
Now, because things like the drunk in the "wrong" house do happen, forced entry ALONE is not justification to use deadly force. What the intruder does after breaking through the door is critical in determining the level of threat and response.
That is the "chance" I would give them.
Every situation is different, many different factors need to be considered in each case. If you live miles from your nearest neighbor, the odds of a drunk coming home to the wrong house are much different than if you live in tract/row housing in suburbia or in a city. That might be a consideration.
Your uncle might actually BE an axe murder...that would be another consideration.
..and shot the person as they were coming in his daughter's window.
It was his daughter who had sneaked out earlier.
This is one of those cases where, clearly, proper threat identification, before shooting, was not done. Making matters worse, is that it was a deputy, someone we assume has been trained in this kind of thing.
If you shoot at a sound, or a vague shape, odds are very high you will be wrong to do so.
Despite what the press tries hard to make us believe, Castle Doctine / stand you ground laws are do not give you the right to shoot someone. Other laws cover that, and have for some time. Castle doctrine, etc, laws are legal protection from spurious prosecution if you are otherwise justified.