I've been considering purchasing a new range gun. I want a full sized .45.
Previous experience with a .45 was an XDS; I liked the gun, but I found it a bit "snappy," which I attributed to its size. My carpal tunnels would start to act up after about 20-25 rounds.
I'm NOT looking to carry it; I have my Shield 9mm for EDC. I'm looking for a range gun, and possibly something to grab if the need arises at home.
I have been considering the FNX 45 (sometimes called the FNP) and the M&P 45. I have read quite a bit about both, and I have held both. I like the feel of both. I do not have a preference as to striker or hammer fired. The difference in magazine capacity also isn't a factor for me. I'm not a fan of the 1911 platform, so that is not an option for me; I'm looking for opinions of these two weapons.
Is there a valid argument for one over the other? or like most things does it just come down to personal preference?
Exco
Previous experience with a .45 was an XDS; I liked the gun, but I found it a bit "snappy," which I attributed to its size. My carpal tunnels would start to act up after about 20-25 rounds.
I'm NOT looking to carry it; I have my Shield 9mm for EDC. I'm looking for a range gun, and possibly something to grab if the need arises at home.
I have been considering the FNX 45 (sometimes called the FNP) and the M&P 45. I have read quite a bit about both, and I have held both. I like the feel of both. I do not have a preference as to striker or hammer fired. The difference in magazine capacity also isn't a factor for me. I'm not a fan of the 1911 platform, so that is not an option for me; I'm looking for opinions of these two weapons.
Is there a valid argument for one over the other? or like most things does it just come down to personal preference?
Exco