rickyrick said:So we don’t acknowledge that 30 round magazines allow a gun to fire more time before reloading than a 10 round?
That doesn't follow from anything anyone has written in this thread. Who has suggested that you should not acknowledge a true statement?
rickyrick said:The point is, I don’t think we should have any limits on firearms. So to me there should be no discussion.
The second sentence doesn't follow from the first. How are other people supposed to learn that you believe in no limits if you never discuss it?
rickyrick said:People that want to make guns seem fun and warm and fuzzy are part of the problem.
If you ever find such a person, bring him to our attention.
rickyrick said:If it is your absolute right to own a gun, why are we even worried?
Governments that don't recognise peoples' rights are prominent in history. That one has a right doesn't mean he should not worry about keeping it.
rickyrick said:No compromise means no discussion.
That's clearly false. Do you need examples of people who've discussed a matter but not compromised?
rickyrick said:If you decide to have a discussion, you should have something a little stronger than “its fun”
That's a solid response to the argument that one should say nothing stronger than "it's fun". Happily, no one urged that.
Last edited: