Glenn E. Meyer
New member
Noxious restrictions are a well thought out strategy to negate gun ownership and carry.
Opponents to shall issue bills argue that if a bill is passed, shall issue should include fees, tests and location bans to such an extent to make carry or ownership very unattractive.
Banning malls, churchs, schools, theaters, restaurants, etc. - are all part of this. Expensive fees and tests - similar.
Those who support the property rights argument for carry bans at commmerical locations should realize they are being played as suckers by antigunner folk. Same with exhorbitant fees and tests.
Opponents to shall issue bills argue that if a bill is passed, shall issue should include fees, tests and location bans to such an extent to make carry or ownership very unattractive.
Banning malls, churchs, schools, theaters, restaurants, etc. - are all part of this. Expensive fees and tests - similar.
Those who support the property rights argument for carry bans at commmerical locations should realize they are being played as suckers by antigunner folk. Same with exhorbitant fees and tests.