I have never seen any data about safe lead bullet use in Glocks other than "I have never had a problem" or "the bore is still shiny". No measurements or pressure readings from shooters who say that it is safe.
This is part of the problem with this topic.
It is true that many people shoot lead bullets in Glocks without incident. No one is denying that is possible, the problem comes when one tries to come up with a general rule that will
insure a person can shoot lead bullets in Glocks without incident.
Passamaneck's testing revealed that even "identical" Glock pistols being shot with identical loads leaded at dramatically different rates. One gun would start showing dangerous pressures after only a couple of boxes while another Glock, that was apparently identical to the first, shot several hundred rounds and still wasn't showing enough pressure increase to be problematic.
So the first thing people want to know is
can it be done without blowing up the gun? The answer is "Yes". People do it all the time. The problem is the answer to the next question.
The second thing a prudent person will want to know is "
HOW can it be done safely?"
There is no definitive answer to that question for those of us without pressure measuring equipment and that's where things start to get wrapped around the axle.
After thoroughly investigating the phenomenon, Passamaneck declined to give any advice on how to shoot lead bullets through a Glock bore and stopped using lead bullets himself. My understanding of his comments indicate that he avoided trying to come up with a "safe formula" because he didn't feel that there was rule or set of rules that one could follow to
insure that a problem could be avoided.
I don't presume to step in where Passamaneck feared to tread, but I think there are some rules that can be followed to
REDUCE,
not eliminate the chances of an incident.
Don't push the length of your practice sessions with lead bullets and frequently check for leading, especially anytime you try a new pistol or a new load.
Don't use maximum loads.
Don't EVER put ANY jacketed rounds through a Glock barrel that's had lead bullets shot through it until the bore has been thoroughly cleaned and all leading removed from it. I read a posting on another forum many years ago by a person who blew up his Glock 19 with 51 rounds. 50 lead rounds followed by a single jacketed factory round. The gun came apart spectacularly when the jacketed round tried to fit down the constricted bore. This practice can cause damage even in standard rifling. Speer's ballistics expert, Allan Jones, recommends against the practice in all firearms citing his examination of several firearms damaged by the practice and as I mentioned above, Beretta includes a warning against it in several of their pistol manuals.
Don't assume that just because you've never had a problem before you're home free. Little things can make a big difference. If you change loads/load components or start using a different Glock pistol or replace a barrel, don't assume that everything will still be the same. As mentioned above "identical" Glock pistols can behave very differently in terms of leading.
Finally, be aware that given the unusual nature of Glock rifling, leading may not be easy to detect. One shooter on another forum bought a Glock 17 for a pittance (under $200) because the barrel was "shot out". I suggested that it wasn't shot out that it was merely badly lead-fouled. He checked again and was certain that it wasn't lead-fouled. It wasn't until I convinced him to carefully test the inside of the bore by trying to gently scratch it with a small screwdriver that he verified that the smooth interior of the bore was actually the result of lead fouling. This story, by the way, is a testament to the sturdiness of the G17 and how overbuilt the original 9mm Glocks were. I do not believe that a .40 S&W Glock would have stood up to being shot with that much lead fouling in the bore.