Blue Duck357
New member
:Well not everybody, but a lot
Most places I posted when considering my next purchase came back mainly with negative comments. Some call Glock the "Dark side" try talking about a S/W auto in .40 S/W
Picked up my used police surplus (pre-boycott for those interested) 4006 today, due to weather only got 50 rounds through it which doesn't prove a thing reliability wise of course. I also only got to shoot four 5 shot groups seriusly trying at 25 yards accuracy wise so thats definitly still of question too but here's what I found so far with my gun.
Trigger: Heard it would be horrid and was expecting such. Single action there is a lot of take-up, but I can deal with that. Double action is however great, not very heavy at all (much lighter than the Beretta and Taurus guns I've owned and as light as the 2 Sig's I've shot) and most important exceptionally smooth.
Ergonomics: Glad I got to try one in a shop as all I'd heard about S/W autos were that that they didn't fit anybody and that the decocker was hard to reach. I must be nobody because it fits me like a glove (much better than a G-19) and I could reach everythig just fine.
Weight: Kept hearing it was too heavy. Well it is heavy no doubt. Much heavier than most 40's,bad for carry maybe, but good for shooting! I found the Glock 23 to be a bit snappy for my taste, but this gun is about the same size as the 23 but compares in recoil to the extra full size Glock 35. The 4006 is the closest thing I've found to an "easy shooting" 40. At one time I thought I just didn't like the 40 cartridge, I now realize that I personally just needed it in a bit heavier gun.
Mag safety: Cannot feel it at all in the trigger pull, but did think "Well darn it is a piece of junk" when I had the mag out when first examining the gun and couldn't get it to dryfire. I finally figured it out
Accuracy 50 rounds of one brand is no test, especially when the first 20 were just getting the feel of the gun. But already I've gotten better groups than my G-23,G-22 or 1991A1's gave, and thats comparing first trip out with one ammo brand with this gun compared to those guns with thier favorite loads.
Just goes to show that even though a bunch of very knowlegable people don't like something doesn't mean it may not work best for you personally. Reliability's still a question which I need to prove to myself, but right now I'm happy as a clam. I guess part of it is me being anti fashionable because it gives me some perverse pleasure to be sitting here so high on a such an unloved gun
Most places I posted when considering my next purchase came back mainly with negative comments. Some call Glock the "Dark side" try talking about a S/W auto in .40 S/W
Picked up my used police surplus (pre-boycott for those interested) 4006 today, due to weather only got 50 rounds through it which doesn't prove a thing reliability wise of course. I also only got to shoot four 5 shot groups seriusly trying at 25 yards accuracy wise so thats definitly still of question too but here's what I found so far with my gun.
Trigger: Heard it would be horrid and was expecting such. Single action there is a lot of take-up, but I can deal with that. Double action is however great, not very heavy at all (much lighter than the Beretta and Taurus guns I've owned and as light as the 2 Sig's I've shot) and most important exceptionally smooth.
Ergonomics: Glad I got to try one in a shop as all I'd heard about S/W autos were that that they didn't fit anybody and that the decocker was hard to reach. I must be nobody because it fits me like a glove (much better than a G-19) and I could reach everythig just fine.
Weight: Kept hearing it was too heavy. Well it is heavy no doubt. Much heavier than most 40's,bad for carry maybe, but good for shooting! I found the Glock 23 to be a bit snappy for my taste, but this gun is about the same size as the 23 but compares in recoil to the extra full size Glock 35. The 4006 is the closest thing I've found to an "easy shooting" 40. At one time I thought I just didn't like the 40 cartridge, I now realize that I personally just needed it in a bit heavier gun.
Mag safety: Cannot feel it at all in the trigger pull, but did think "Well darn it is a piece of junk" when I had the mag out when first examining the gun and couldn't get it to dryfire. I finally figured it out
Accuracy 50 rounds of one brand is no test, especially when the first 20 were just getting the feel of the gun. But already I've gotten better groups than my G-23,G-22 or 1991A1's gave, and thats comparing first trip out with one ammo brand with this gun compared to those guns with thier favorite loads.
Just goes to show that even though a bunch of very knowlegable people don't like something doesn't mean it may not work best for you personally. Reliability's still a question which I need to prove to myself, but right now I'm happy as a clam. I guess part of it is me being anti fashionable because it gives me some perverse pleasure to be sitting here so high on a such an unloved gun