Enough With The Hillary-Bashing...

OBAMA?!

An empty suit who has said, outright, that he wants to ban ALL semiautomatics?

From his own site, even!

Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.

WTF are you smoking?
 
He was also in this state saying that "hunters don't need 17-clip semiautomatics", :rolleyes: repeatedly mistaking the second amendment for being about hunting.

Also, if you look at his history, he's a product of the Daley machine. He'd turn the US into Illinois.
 
I do love my guns...

I would feverishly protest anti-gun laws, and I firmly believe that civilians should be allowed to own just about any weapon short of explosives. However, with our 4th and 5th amendment in danger because of current laws passed I would vote for anyone who would be willing to restore them. It's just unbelievably stupid though that politicians will play one amendment in order to take down another. If we truly had followed the Constitution we wouldn't have this 2-party = 1-megaparty bull$417. We'd actually have officials that represented people not party line. Overall though, I really wish Ron Paul had a chance of winning the primaries, but since the neo-con idiots think it's okay to destroy America with the help of far-left liberals I don't see that happening. I think we need more center based officials.


Epyon
 
Obama is my least favorite candidate, partly because he seems to be the worst on RKBA. In fact, he has the distinction of being one of the few candidates for whom I'd vote for Hillary first.
 
Im not a Hillary fan but she is the one in the Clinton family with the brains. She has done a pretty good job polishing her act while she has been in the Senate. Dredging up the past of the old Clinton Administration pretty much admits that the failure of the poeple using that to come up with anything about her now. Didnt work then and it probably has less of a chance now.

I am no Hannity fanboy...but he hit the nail on the head it would be highly counterproductive.
 
"Im not a Hillary fan but she is the one in the Clinton family with the brains."

I think Chelsea is smarter.

John
 
Heck, I quit smoking and may even give up fried foods just so I can someday ah...ah... 'dance' on her grave.
 
In law school, Hillary did such a good job organizing volunteers for the defence in a Black Panther (Black Marxist separatist group) murder trial that she received a summer internship at the law firm of Robert Truehaft, the former lawyer for Communist Party USA.

But, to her base this would be seen as a good thing. Most people don't even know about this.
 
Maybe Hannity ducked his guest's topics because his viewers are getting bored with Hillary Bashing. There will be plenty of time for that later. After a while people just get tired of constant <insert action of choice>.

Another possibility is his viewers are no longer buying the "republicans = good, democrats = evil" schtick. Maybe his viewers grew some smarts see the two party system is divided along the lines of "Them v Us" instead of "Republicans v Democrats". All kind of reasons are possible for why SH backed off.
 
You know what would be funny? If Hillary and Paul were nominated. Fox would support Hillary and try to bash RP. What would most Fox viewers think if their favorite news network started to support their arch-enemy? That would be interesting to watch. :D

About Hillary: I can't stand her voice, it drives me up the wall. :barf:

and if she were president you can count on a war with Iran, that's another thing I'm afraid of.
 
Probably the best democratic candidate currently seeking the nomination is...Rudi Guiliani. I know he pretends to be a republican, but he's pretty much a Bill Clinton type politician. Personally, looking back on things, I could go for a few more years of Bill, could we get an amendment passed in time?

While we're at it maybe we could repeal the 16th amendment and let the governors appoint and state legislatures approve senators. All this direct electing thing has gotten out of hand. Put the power back into the hands of people who actually have the time to know what's going on.

Face it, you can keep pretty good tabs on you local state reps then trust them to keep an eye on the big guys. It puts the power back in the hands of local politicians and takes a ton of money out of play. It would be much harder to buy scores of local politicians then one washington politician.
 
Democrats

What I don't understand is why would anyone who owns and shoots firearms support ANY DEMOCRAT? The few democrats that do support the right to own guns, are still beholding to the Marxists that control the democratic party. There are enough problems with some of the Republicans supporting gun control. The democrat party is a complete write off as far as I am concerned. Unless you think that socialism is the "wave of the future." I say this because I used to be a democrat. But I long ago decided I didn't want to knowingly be a "useful idiot." (as comrade Stalin said)
 
Well, remember when they said only Nixon could have gone to China. Only a Democrat can actually get away with certain conservative reforms. I can't vote for Republicans because of their idiotic views on personal liberty. I vote for democrats when I feel I can and Libretarians the rest of the time.

What if you are pro-choice, pro gun, pro gay, pro Red Sox, pro drug, pro environment, pro do whatever the hell you want as long as it doesn't hurt me or mine, and anti Yankee and anti corporate welfare? Who am I supposed to vote for? It's hopeless I tell you.
 
Back
Top