You live there. You made a post.
however now 1000 germans have signed a letter stating that they will not visit south-africa if this blood bath continues. they go futher and say that they find it unacceptable to think that an animal they are whatching today may be murderd the next day. they sugest that non lethal methods to frighten elephants away from certain region should be used. this is the first time i have heard the words frighten and elephant in on sentence. futhermore , what is that? -non leathal deterrand for an elephant. but this organisation(people for animal rights-Germany) must know how this tactic work so we must stand back and let them send a few volunteers to come and shoo the elephants away from the wrong regions.
I made a response based on the limited information I have about the current situation in SA.
You want an opinion on elephant culling, and game management, and I give you one. I don't like culling. It's poor management.
Hunting is far superior. Hunters provide huge revenue for Africa, and, the countries that have preserved their wildlife most successfully are the countries that allow hunting.
It's very simple. When the government realizes those white rhinos are worth 150k, and every elephant is at least a 10k license fee, just for the attempt, then people start viewing the animals as a resource, and protect them.
Why have game rangers shooting elephants? Why not give specific licenses to shoot the type of elephants that need to be culled?
Zim issues permits for rogues, cows, etc. when necessary.
Why doesn't SA do the same, or do they?
I agree with the Germans, but, for different reasons. I think that culling elephants is the WORST way to manage game, and, is really mismanagement.
If it has to be done, then do it. :barf:
As for your personal attacks, I am a game preservation advocate. I realize that the best way to do that is to promote hunting animals. Without having value, given by
hunting fees, and licenses, animals are viewed as a nusance to be removed. Yes, I am pro-hunting, because without it, I believe Africa will loose it's wildlife.
As for the Germans that are pro-wildlife: I understand why people would not enjoy looking at animals, then coming back the next day and seeing the entire family group, in a giant pile, having been shot by a bunch of game rangers.
I also think that part of the problem is the game parks allow the animals to get too comfortable with humans, and, the elephants loose their fear, and, are more inclined to do damage to farms, etc.
What do you think of a seasonal hunting time for the parks? Adjust the hunting season length to the number of animals that need to be taken out?
Or, just base it on how many successful hunts are made, and, what the total population is?
For instance, right now, you could have Kruger wide open for hunting until the numbers are down far enough so that the park area can support them?
You could divide the year into bunny-hugger, watcher time, and, hunters time.
So, if all other alternatives have been done to solve your problem, and, culling is the last resort, then do it.
However, I can also understand the feeling of people who enjoy watching animals, and, how they get emotionally attached to them. I can understand why they would find culling a good reason not to go to your parks.
It's also possible that bunny huggers might boycott due to the hunting, if it's allowed. But, that's life. The revenue from hunting is far greater then from bunny-huggers, isn't it?