Capt. Charlie
Moderator Emeritus
We live in Ohio, which does have a duty to retreat in most circumstances.
Not really, Sparks. Ohio now has a castle doctrine.
We live in Ohio, which does have a duty to retreat in most circumstances.
Not really, Sparks. Ohio now has a castle doctrine.
Sorry, but what you would do or not do has nothing to do with what is considered legal or not, which is the main context of what was asked in the OP. Personal attitudes, while important to the individual, rarely matter to the law.you missed it this time david.My wife gave birth Sept 4th 2007 to my youngest son and you honestly think i was going to let anyone get near my wife.
You won't do your wife and the baby much good if you are in jail "taking your lumps" because you didn't care about the law. And nobody has said a thing about analyzing a situation to death or backing down or letting anybody get assaulted or anything like that. If you can't understand that there are lots of options between backing down and killing somebody, you might want to try looking at things a little more.I will take my lumps with the law later.As i have said before i'm no going to analize a situation to death,while my pregnant wife and i are being assaulted.David if you want to back down and let your wife get assaulted then by all means go right ahead but not me.
That's cool if that is a reasonable response to the threat. That is the issue the law is going to be looking at. There are all sorts of physical attacks, all sorts of dangers. The response has to be reasonable given the danger the attack reasonably poses.Ok i'll take out my asp baton and beat their #$%& into submission while my wife calls po-po and waits for the next available officer friendly to show up.There no killing and the said b/g's won't even have the strength to resist arrest.