copenhagen
New member
I understand this, but in the country where there is a lot of open land, it is good to be able to take a target at 500 yards. Plus, you can feed yourself with game this way as well.
don't worry guys, obama just wants to take AK's away from criminals
- Thread starter black
- Start date
I understand this, but in the country where there is a lot of open land, it is good to be able to take a target at 500 yards. Plus, you can feed yourself with game this way as well.
shepherddogs
New member
B lahey asks for proof of Dr Js assertions @ 3:11 and Dr J provides reams of documents @ 3:16. Thats either really fast work or a setup.
LightningJoe
New member
If you don't like AKs, stay in Chicago.
mountainclmbr
New member
I could dig up 150 million or so murders of their own people by Marxist and Socialist (though I don't really see a difference) leaders in the last 100 years. I bet all street crimminal murder totals are not even close. And AK murders would be a tiny fraction unless you counted those done by the government side. If I had to do an action/value analysis I would lock up all Marxists and Socialists before I even thought of regulating guns or transfats or CO2. The Chosen One would be toast under my system.
The Obama nebulous ?
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
O.F.Fascist
New member
Obama says he wants to take AKs out of the hands of criminals.
What he means is that he wants to make AKs illegal, and he wants to take them out of your hands because you are criminals now.
What he means is that he wants to make AKs illegal, and he wants to take them out of your hands because you are criminals now.
Dr. J - what your post simply demonstrates is not that crimes with AK-47 assault rifles are common, but rather that utter ignorance about firearms is common among reporters and politicians.
The AK-47 is a fully-automatic assault rifle, a "machine gun," and crimes committed with actual machine guns, which have been under strict federal regulation since 1934, are exceedingly rare.
A "semiautomatic" rifle operates in much the same way as many hunting rifles - one shot per trigger pull.
It is obvious that anything that looks like an AK-47 is going to be called an AK-47, even if it's not:
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_gunwatch_archive.html
The AK-47 is a fully-automatic assault rifle, a "machine gun," and crimes committed with actual machine guns, which have been under strict federal regulation since 1934, are exceedingly rare.
A "semiautomatic" rifle operates in much the same way as many hunting rifles - one shot per trigger pull.
It is obvious that anything that looks like an AK-47 is going to be called an AK-47, even if it's not:
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_gunwatch_archive.html
It's a steaming pile of bull, friends, and we should remember that.
That's right, Dr. J, and neither does your man Obama; after all, you don't "need" an AK to hunt, right? Obama also supports "sensible gun safety laws" like banning handguns. I suppose that we don't have a "personal need" for handguns, either, because you can't use handguns to hunt, right? Same with that "armor-piercing" ammunition, like .30-30 ammo, right? Nobody has a personal need for that kind of ammo (even if it can be used for hunting).
Yep, the neo-libs and Obama don't see a "need" for so-called "assault weapons", handguns, ammunition, or magazines that hold more than 6 rounds. Because to Obama and his supporters, keeping and bearing arms isn't a matter of an individual Constitutional right; instead, Obama and his friends judge firearms by the standard of what an ordinary, law-abiding civililan "needs" to possess. Not surprisingly, Obama and the rest of his supporters are quick to decree what kind of firearms you really "need" to possess.
LOL. I'm sure you're an expert at accurately 'bump-firing' an AK. And it sounds like you were pretty accurate with that 'bump-firing'. Even though no ordinary, regular civilian would ever "need" to bump fire anything.