Domestic drones?

IIRC, there was a recent article where NYC either has them up and running, or is just about to institute them in certain areas.
Just like in London, they will not STOP an attack, merely allow LE to possibly get some images for use after the fact
 
Many of these craft can see through your walls in levels of detail you wouldnt believe.

You've been watching way too many movies. The technology you are referring is still highly underdeveloped and does not have the granularity that you seem to think exists. Nor would it be used for the domestic surveillance that some here are bleating about. And certainly not on the drones that state and municipal police departments MIGHT deploy.
 
It seems a little like the genie is out of the bottle and won't go back in.

I am concerned at what point drones become armed. Hellfires are not going to happen, but smaller weapons. I suspect the calculation may be, say, finding an active shooter holed up in a house, why risk our troops if we can take out the threat from a distance and angle impossible for people on the ground?

Budget pressures at the county and municipal level are almost always met by curtailing public safety personnel, and more cities are going to run into the choice of bankruptcy or becoming a pension provider instead of being a service provider to citizens.

At some point, it's human nature that some LE official is going to claim he needs armed drones to preserve civil order, there aren't enough people available to manage the task, and not enough money to hire more people.

Of course, a lot of people are figuring out how responsible they are or must be for their own self-defense, and I'd rather go there than have armed drones overhead. There are real limitations on what drones can see, and huge mistakes could be made. A large settlement in a lawsuit may be of little comfort to a false target.
 
You've been watching way too many movies. The technology you are referring is still highly underdeveloped and does not have the granularity that you seem to think exists. Nor would it be used for the domestic surveillance that some here are bleating about. And certainly not on the drones that state and municipal police departments MIGHT deploy.

Prior to retirement I had training on two different thermal systems TTS and TIS and all manner of military night vision devices. It was very good when I retired, and can only have gotten better... Sooner or later this tech will be flying and sooner or later the police will have it... Might be a decade or two but it will happen.
 
I think everyone is afraid that these things may be as good as possible users only wish they were. When the Air Force said they ruled the skys in the past, they only thought they did; or more correctly, if they did, they didn't rule the ground.
 
And I guess walls and a solid roof never gave you an expectation of privacy either???? Many of these craft can see through your walls in levels of detail you wouldnt believe. Should the government who is to protect us now be recording us through our house walls and in our most private moments?

It can and will happen and wont matter if its an accident or intentional, it will happen.. No the government must have clear limits of its power and ability to spy on the population.
There is a Supreme Court decision that says the use of infrared technology to "see" through the walls of one's home is a search and would normally require a warrant. They have accepted cert on a case where police conduct a "knock and talk" at the front door (perfectly lawful so far) but have a drug dog with them who alerts to the smell of marijuana from inside the house. Is this like the use of infrared to "see" inside the home or just a simple knock and talk? Interesting question for the court to answer.
 
I believe the same limitations will apply that already apply. Police departments have used helicopters and planes to inspect property for years. They use them regularly to look for marihuana fields. You have very little expectation of privacy from the air.
 
Back
Top