HiBC said:
What is(IMO) ridiculous is the notion that if its done by "GonzoGhuruBlackOps TacWorks) its somehow more acceptable than a labor of love amateur job.
Do you really think"GonzoGhuru"sits around with a woodburning pen actually doing the job you pay him for? He likely has a high school hang around kid do it.
Either A) Someone has odd priorities, or B) The job stands for itself.
One point you made, but not quoted above, I'll agree with: stippling can reduce market appeal. Some folks just don't like it. Others do. For the ones that do, a lack of stippling might also reduce market appeal...
In making your next two point, you've used a debating technique called "
Reductio ad absurdum" in which (put simply) you pick extreme examples and ask us to assume they are somehow typical.
Most of us have said, with regard to stippling, it'll depend on how well the work was done. A crappy stippling job might degrade the value of the gun. A good one might not. One by a "big name" firm, beautifully done with proof that they did it, might even get the seller some extra money -- but only if the buyer wants (or doesn't dislike) stippling.
A stippling job done by a big-name gunsmithing firm (like Robar) is likely to look pretty darned good, because the firm's reputation rests on the work they do. That work is typically NOT DONE by a hang-around high school kids (unless they're family members learning the business).
On the other hand, a lot of amateur stippling jobs aren't all that great. They might be OKAY, but nothing to get excited about. A "work of love" done by a talented amateur may be both attractive and functional, but it might not justify a price increase over the standard (un-stippled) price of the same gun, if that's the only change. But someone who wants an "original" gun may not even consider the weapon.
The finished product is what will help the buyer decide, but as has been said more than once, not everybody likes stippling.
HiBC said:
I read an article about Holland and Holland,the fine,handmade British shotgun.
The H+H spokesman interviewed in the article said the American idea of not "altering" a fine H+H double was BARNCARPET!! Ridiculous!!Anyone who thinks so has no idea what an H+H double is about.
The point is having a fine shotgun built precisely to fit the person who ordered it. The next owner will be different.To truly have an H+H means going to H+H with the shotgun TO HAVE IT ALTERED.
Strange reasoning. Holland and Holland builds custom guns -- "bespoke", I think, is the term used with clothing, but it can be applied to other things, too. Those weapons are built, from scratch, to suit the buyer's tastes and physical requirements (or quirks). Not everybody can afford (or is willing) to fly to London to get changes made if they acquire or inherit a Holland and Holland weapon.
The guns we've been talking about aren't CUSTOM weapons. And applying the standards used when discussing custom guns doesn't seem appropriate here.
That people want or need more than the standard run of the mill product explains why more and more guns increasingly have different grip inserts or grip panels, can have different sights, different length barrels, maybe even different caliber barrels, and why trigger mods are increasingly available, (or come adjustable from the factory), etc. etc. And if the frames aren't polymer, that's also why different types of grips and finishes are available. It's not always about FUNCTION alone, but some of these changes, including stippling, can improve function in some applications.
.