My P99 is a very good pistol. It has been reliable, accurate and with its QPQ (duo-tone) finish, quite "cool" looking!
Now if it came in .357 Sig!
How this does PAIN me to extoll any virtues of the .40S&W :barf:, it surely is no 10mm Auto (and why it is more popular then the 10mm is beyond me!), but I think this needs to be said.
Wild Romanian, your post does offer some points that are quite confounding.
At what pressure is the 40S&W operating? Higher the 9mm? Lower then 9mm? Or the same as 9mm? 35k psi is the SAAMI operating pressure of the .40S&W and the 9mm. I don't see how that is any higher then the 9mm.
Any frame abuse that has taken place in the .40S&W, has been shown to be from early production (9mm frames with 40S&W slide assemblies) S&W and the Glocks prior to the addition to the additional frame pin. With the amount of police agencies flocking to the .40S&W over the 9mm/.45acp, if there happened to be any frame problems it seems to reason that those problems would have surfaced by now.
As for the benefit of velocity. . . Looking at the velocities of the 9mm and the .40S&W and comparing rounds of the same section density (115gr .355" and the 155gr .400"), there's a marginal difference. From my P99 and Sig 229, I have averaged about 1125fps with the .40S&W 155gr loadings (STHP) and in 9mm standard pressure (no +P) 115gr I have gotten about 1175fps. 50fps difference with the same SD, not really that much of a difference. At least not a difference a BG would notice.
As far as recoil, that's in the hands of the shooter. Firstly we are firing defensive calibers and those are FAR from hard recoiling rounds. It is not as if we are comparing a .32ACP to the MOA Maximum in .375 H&H (I'd love the squeeze one of those bad boys off, my wrist shudders at that thought, I know how my Rem 700 Classic in .375 H&H behaves!
). Secondly, the slides/recoil springs of the .40S&W are usually heavier then the slides/recoil on a 9mm, translating to that their felt recoil energy is about equal. Also recoil is quite subjective. And with a strong shooting stance/grip/practice, the stoutest of defensive calibers are managable. Now are those stout defensive calibers (whatever they maybe) the best first handgun calibers? I'd say not.
The popular 3 (9mm, .40S&W and .45acp) in their comparable popular weight loadings (115/147gr 9mm, 155/180 40S&W and 185/230gr 45) are ballistic mirror images of each other and really the only advantge seen in any of the mentioned calibers is in the shooter's eyes or Marshall & Sanow/Fuller index numbers. . . C O M hits with any of those loadings are NOT the finger of God and it is quite unrealistic to expect any one defensive cartridge to be THE grand high dragon of one shot stops. If there was such a loading, there would be no other calibers made because we'd all be carrying that loading!
You state that an original 9mm Walther P99 will give "outstanding accuracy" but then go on to say that a "1911 or a steel framed 9mm" will give you better accuracy if you have that "regunsmithed into a super target weapon". Which is better? Impressive out of the box accuracy or a pistol that needs to be send to a gunsmith and more money spent to be super accurate?
Derek