Mike Kilo Niner
New member
Ok, dilemma: I went to the friendly local FFL this afternoon to check out .45 pistols. In particular, I'm interested in HKs and Sig Sauers. I tried a Glock. I tried a 1911. I can see why others like them, but neither suits me.
This gun will be a night-stand, home-defense pistol (with frequent field trips to the range. Somewhere down the line I'll probably add a tactical light.
The Sig fits my hand like a glove. The HK holds two more rounds. The HK can be ordered VarII for lefties like me. The Sig had the nicer DA trigger pull, but their SA seemed more or less equivalent. The Sig's push-button mag release is easier to manipulate (when reversed for a lefty) than the USP's ambidextrous lever. But the USP's lever is fully ambidextrous right out of the box.
I've rented them both at the range, and both shoot pretty well for me. They both feel good, but they feel very different. I'm sure I could learn to shoot either very well with practice.
I'm torn. I guess what it boils down to is: the HK has better lefty-friendly features, greater capacity and a built in rail for a light mount whereas the Sig is... a Sig.
Maybe I've answered my own question, but I'm very interested in opinions from people who own either or both. What was the deciding factor for choosing one or the other? Which one is on your nightstand?
And before anyone suggests it: I can't afford both right now. Down the road -- naturally! But for now, which one do I want to protect myself and my loved ones?
[edited for clarity]
This gun will be a night-stand, home-defense pistol (with frequent field trips to the range. Somewhere down the line I'll probably add a tactical light.
The Sig fits my hand like a glove. The HK holds two more rounds. The HK can be ordered VarII for lefties like me. The Sig had the nicer DA trigger pull, but their SA seemed more or less equivalent. The Sig's push-button mag release is easier to manipulate (when reversed for a lefty) than the USP's ambidextrous lever. But the USP's lever is fully ambidextrous right out of the box.
I've rented them both at the range, and both shoot pretty well for me. They both feel good, but they feel very different. I'm sure I could learn to shoot either very well with practice.
I'm torn. I guess what it boils down to is: the HK has better lefty-friendly features, greater capacity and a built in rail for a light mount whereas the Sig is... a Sig.
Maybe I've answered my own question, but I'm very interested in opinions from people who own either or both. What was the deciding factor for choosing one or the other? Which one is on your nightstand?
And before anyone suggests it: I can't afford both right now. Down the road -- naturally! But for now, which one do I want to protect myself and my loved ones?
[edited for clarity]