Did someone mention how much Glock has influenced the industry?

9x19

New member
...or TacLights on pistols?

27807.jpg


Hehehehehehehe
 
Yeah, but...

...I think the commercially-successful USP's tac rail had more direct influence on the general handgun market than the commercial flop VP-70's polymer frame did. ;)
 
True, but Glock did it with a smattering of sense, ie Weaver standard vs. H&K proprietary.

It's remarkable, to me, how much the matteblack and lightrail SA looks like a Glock. {shrug}
 
Well this is a first!

I have never heard anyone state how much any 1911 looks like any Glock. Regardless of factory modifications. ;)
 
Glock influenced the industry?

Industry influenced Glock?

tip down barrel? hmm browning right?

Hmmmmm short slide recoil action? Colt? Ruger? Walther?

I dunno I think Glock just figured out Polymers and lightened up semi autos....

So if lighter semi autos is the question, yes.....they did, but they used lots of other innovations that were in other mfg's models.


Kinda like the HS2000 is doing the best of both worlds with a Glock like action and trigger safety, Beretta features and Walther p99 features........but it all goes back to Mr. Browning's tip up barrel too right?
 
Gaston Glock- Poor guy, hasn't been able to come up with a new design in the last fifteen years. I bet he's in Aruba sippin' a umbrella drink.......
 
LARRY!

Pull it back up!!!!

That's not what blades67 meant... or is it? Hey, you two wanna be alone? {leaving now, eyes safely shielded} :D
 
Mike Erwin wrote:
>>> Think Smith & Wesson is getting a raw deal? Read this first. Then we can talk.

Mike, yes I do. That document is dated 3/2000. Since that time, the English company sold S&W to the managers. They employ a lot of people in an area with a tough economy, and BTW, they're booming with their best sales month ever. How about if we both decide to boycott a company that made guns for Nazis, or Communists, or come from countries where the people that make them aren't allowed to buy them? Or lets boycott Kahr or Ruger because they picked up their skirts and ran rather than trying to come up with a model that meets MA laws, even though they have operations in MA.

The boycott is over, there are lots of other issues that are more important for gun owners these days.
 
Correct me if i´m wrong but i recall reading somewhere that the "safe action" existed prior to Glock´s extreme comercial success.

Rails, an HK thing.
Polymer, also an HK thing.

Then Gaston´s genius comes from gathering all these already existing qualities and put them into an amazinly simple gun.

I like the gun, but i rather give credit where it´s due.

NB;)
 
Gaston Glock- Poor guy, hasn't been able to come up with a new design in the last fifteen years.

It's not like he's had any real need to. The same old gun in various sizes and calibers is still selling like gangbusters.;)
 
VVG,

Wrong thread, but:

1. Tompkins selling the company didn't negate the agreement.

2. Saf-T-Hammer publically stated that it would "abide by all existing agreements." You do the math on that.

3. S&W, like every other firearms company, is benefitting from the events of September 11.

4. It's tough economic times all over, but quite frankly, the only people who owe S&W's employees anything is S&W's management. The employees can find new jobs. I can't find new rights.

5. Nazi & Communist guns? That's called the spoils of victory. You buy the loser's weapons and dance on their graves.

6. As long as I draw breath, I will continue to work toward educating firearms owners/potential owners about the dangers posed by the agreement, and will work toward a total boycott of the company UNTIL S&W's management withdraws from it.
 
Actually, true designer geniuses DO have the need to create and improve and invent. Glock is simply resting on his success. When one gets lucky and becomes a millionaire overnight where's the motivation? He was in the right place at the right time...nothing more.
 
Back
Top