My father was robbed at gunpoint in his own backyard -- this was in a state that required a purchase permit for each handgun bought and before the permit was issued, the applicant had to bring in two references in person to the local police station so that the person's character could be determined.
Under these conditions, I felt fairly certain that the person who robbed my father had obtained the gun through illegal channels -- meaning there were already laws in place to stop this but those laws were not enforced!
I didn't go around calling for more gun laws to be passed. I concluded that if they can't enforce the current laws, then how are they going to enforce additional laws.
Fortunately, my father wasn't hurt. The amount of money taken was minimual and this event prompted me to purchase my first firearm for self defense purposes (I had just turned 21 and was of legal age to purchase a handgun). If it wasn't for this happening, I might not have developed an interest in firearms.
Of course, if my father was injuried or killed, I
might have gone the other way.
Moral of the story ... some people will always be "pro" gun while others will always be "anti" gun with a majority of the people being someplace in the middle
depending on which side gets to them first, and how.
Share what you know, learn what you don't -- FUD
[This message has been edited by FUD (edited May 03, 2000).]