Erikbal said:
Peetzakilla you're saying in NY I DON'T need to inform them I am armed? So even if an armed robber was co ing at me I could get in trouble for shooting? What about just shooting in the leg or something to disable, not shooting to kill? That is messed up...
With all due respect, "this" is not messed up, YOU are messed up ... because you are making it more complicated than it is. Peetzakilla gave you the full text of the law, and you immediately misconstrued it. Please read it again, carefully.
You MAY use force to resist an assault or a burglary in NY state. To my great surprise, according to what PK cited you can even use deadly force to resist a burglary in NY state. I did NOT expect that.
Now, go back to what I posted above. The law says you may use deadly force:
3. A person in possession or control of, or licensed or privileged to be in, a dwelling or an occupied building, who reasonably believes that another person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary of such dwelling or building, may use deadly physical force upon such other person when he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of such burglary.
Note the use of the word "reasonably" -- twice. Yes, you can use deadly force, BUT the circumstances must be such that you "reasonably" have no other recourse.
As to shooting in the leg: Aside from the fact that only works in B-movies, using a firearm is using deadly force, whether you shoot to kill, shoot to wound (good luck with that), or fire a warning shot. In some states (possibly including NY), just showing the gun is legally construed as using deadly force.
So the simple answer to your question is: Yes, you CAN use a gun to protect yourself, but you'd better be sure there's no other way out. I would NOT use a gun in NY just to protect property, only to protect human life.