Doc Hudson
New member
Let me clarify My position
Gentlemen,
If you understood my posts to claim that the .45-70 is superior to a .375 H&H, a .416 Rigby, or other well known Dangerous Game Cartridge, I apologize. That was not my intention.
I simply wanted to point out that modern .45-70 loads are not the cream-puff loads that so many people think they are. While the .45-70 might not reach the minimum limit in some countries, remember one thing. Those limits were established by politicians. I refuse to believe that African Politicians are any more intelligent than politicians the world over.
With proper bullets, correct bullet placement, and a heavy load, I still say that the .45-70 is capable of killing any game animal. Compare the ballistics from Buffalo bore, Cor-Bon, and Garret to the ballistics quoted for such famous African cartridges as the .450 BPE, and .450 #2, or even the .450 NE. If those greand old cartridges were considered fine elephant and buffalo cartridges, why the flap about .45-70's?
Some one asked about the performance of a .45-70 load on a game animal at 200 yards. Personally I would not take the shot. While I have no compunction at shooting paper or steel targets pout to 600 yards and further, my game limt for a .45-70 is 100 yards. If the shots are at longer range, I'd use a scoped bolt action in a different caliber. As Dirty Harry said, "A man's got to know his limitations." And I know mine with a .45-70.
Now, defense of the .45-70 aside, if I were going on an African Buffalo hunt, which rifle would I take? If legal, I'd take my .45-70 Marlin along as a backup gun, but for my primary gun, I'd take the opportunity to buy a .416 Rigby bolt action of some sort. As I said, .416 Rigby, preferably in a John Rigby & Sons rifle is one of my rifles.
Doc Hudson
Gentlemen,
If you understood my posts to claim that the .45-70 is superior to a .375 H&H, a .416 Rigby, or other well known Dangerous Game Cartridge, I apologize. That was not my intention.
I simply wanted to point out that modern .45-70 loads are not the cream-puff loads that so many people think they are. While the .45-70 might not reach the minimum limit in some countries, remember one thing. Those limits were established by politicians. I refuse to believe that African Politicians are any more intelligent than politicians the world over.
With proper bullets, correct bullet placement, and a heavy load, I still say that the .45-70 is capable of killing any game animal. Compare the ballistics from Buffalo bore, Cor-Bon, and Garret to the ballistics quoted for such famous African cartridges as the .450 BPE, and .450 #2, or even the .450 NE. If those greand old cartridges were considered fine elephant and buffalo cartridges, why the flap about .45-70's?
Some one asked about the performance of a .45-70 load on a game animal at 200 yards. Personally I would not take the shot. While I have no compunction at shooting paper or steel targets pout to 600 yards and further, my game limt for a .45-70 is 100 yards. If the shots are at longer range, I'd use a scoped bolt action in a different caliber. As Dirty Harry said, "A man's got to know his limitations." And I know mine with a .45-70.
Now, defense of the .45-70 aside, if I were going on an African Buffalo hunt, which rifle would I take? If legal, I'd take my .45-70 Marlin along as a backup gun, but for my primary gun, I'd take the opportunity to buy a .416 Rigby bolt action of some sort. As I said, .416 Rigby, preferably in a John Rigby & Sons rifle is one of my rifles.
Doc Hudson