Dancing In The Blood Of Children and Innocents

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jungle Work

Moderator
It looks like the Brady Bunch and the Millions of Mothas are organizing to dance in the latest blood of innocents and children. Don't think it'll do them much good though, most folks realize their true agenda and do not agree with iit.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200503\POL20050322c.html

I guess the Million Mothas and the Bradys are now alinging with the National Socialist Nazi Party, as they would too like the Jews, Catholics, Negros and Mexicans disarmed also.

http://leverkuhn.redstate.org/story/2005/3/22/225247/090

Jeff Weise liked gun free School Zones and unarmed people also.

Jungle Work
 
Last edited:
Why do you feel it necessary to use condescending and derogatory language like "Mothas" in your post? This type of language and attitude only shows a lack of education on your part.
 
70-101,
Golly Gee Son, I didn't mean to hurt the feelings and sensativities of any of the little Girly Men who might be lurking around this board. Sweet Jesus pussy cat, grow up and let go of mommy's skirt. As for education, the 16th grade was the most happy three years of my life. But that was not where I got my true education. God, you must be a weiner if mothas offends you.

101, I hope you understand my sorrow and contempt for you is as great as for the Brady Bunch and the Million Mothas out there.
If this is not clear enough, please let me know. I hope you take this in the proper manner and spirit in which it is intended.

Jungle Work
 
Well if the gun banners want to seize upon a couple of gun "control" law that could *possibly* help prevent things like this from happening again, it would be:

"No law enforcement officer shall be allowed to take home any of their service weapons; rather; they must check them out at the beginning of each shift, and check them back in at the station/office at the end of each shift"

Coupled with

"All school security gaurds and teachers shall be armed if they so desire; their right to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed."

Somehow I don't think that's what they'll advocate however...

Jungle, take that personal insult crap to PMs please, or the supernatural powers that be on TFL will do bad things to you possibly. You too 101. Thanks. :)
 
FF-
Agreed. Now, one step further:
Do the math....with this latest tragedy, history has "demonstrated", based on proportional ownership of firearms by Law Abiding Citizens and Cops: Firearms owned by Police Officers are "more likely" to be used in school massacres than those owned by LAC's.

There's no way around it. If cornered, they need to argue for tighter controls on Cops guns or admit their own logic has been flawed for decades (ie: Admit it's NOT the gun....it's the willingness to kill).
Rich
 
Sad that a LEO had a POS Grandson living with him and it cost him his life. Probably no other place for the grandson to go. To me it seems impossible not to know what your children or any child that lives with you is doing and how they think.

I would imagine there are some LEOs who would welcome the ability to be really, really off duty if they had to check in their weapons at the end of shift. Sure would make it easier to walk past a robbery or a rape in progress and just call it in, if that and keep on walking.

And we all know what the Anti's Agenda is and how they plan on implementing it. I think they just don't count on folks who will hold them personally accountable for their actions to deprive Citizens of the United States of their Constitutional and God Given Rights. Sounds like a dangerous line of work to me.
Kinda like Humpty Dumpty, "all the King's Horses and all of the King's Men will not be able to protect them".

Jungle Work
 
Take a Google search. Lakewood in Colorado. Chief Pierce Brooks. Disarming the LEO is NOT a new idea. WWAD, What Would Andy Do?
 
Had a good laugh going in to work this morning. The radio host is pretty liberal, though not quite of the raving, frothing-at-the-mouth type. He paraded his usual "It's the guns" tripe, and had one of the media reporters on with her "It's the guns" tripe. His first FIVE callers all said there should have been guns in that school and....:D I laughed so hard I almost had to pull over.

Pops
 
Here's the part that I don't understand:

In its press release, the Brady campaign criticized federal lawmakers for letting the "assault weapons ban" expire.

Pray tell, which of the three guns used was an "assault weapon"?

Police issued .40cal? If it has a standard capacity magazine, it was issued to a policeman who, during the ban, was one of the only ones that could have standard cap. mags.

Shotgun? I don't remember those on the list.

.22 pistol? Again, I don't remember those on the list.

So is the brady bunch telling us that any gun is now an "assault weapon"?

These people make me :barf: .

Wayne
 
I actually think there was one good piece of advice given by a democrat, oddly enough, one who did a lot of damage to gun owners.


[Parents must ask themselves] what else they can do to shield our children from violent images and experiences that warp young perceptions and obscure the consequences of violence

--Bill Clinton

I rarely agree with the guy, but you can only ban so far, then waddya gonna do?
 
SHAME on the Brady Campaign & MMM

CNS news had a link at the bottom of the article to allow responses. So I had to throw my $0.02 into the hat. Here's what I wrote:

Shame on The Brady Campaign to Prevent Handgun Violence and the Million Mom March!

It's bad enough that there are 10 people who are gone from their families, but does the Brady campaign have to jump in with it's shrill sound-bites, lies and deceit yet again?

The Brady Campaign is lumping this tragedy with other shootings we have seen the media sensationalize recently, claiming the tragic event in Minnesota is somehow related, all at once, to; the expiration of the ineffective "assault weapons" ban; limited resources to investigate gun sellers; laws protecting your privacy after legally purchasing a firearm and a pending bill to prevent frivolous lawsuits against gun makers.

The problem is, that's wrong.

What's worse, is the Brady Campaign and Million Mom March know that this is wrong. But distorting the truth to get on the 6 o'clock news is old-hat for these folks.

The troubled teen who killed 10 people didn't use an "assault weapon". That pretty much rules out their first connection. Nor did he obtain any of the weapons from a licensed gun dealer, so that link can be swept away. Since he didn't buy his guns, the records issue dissolves too. Sue the gun maker for allowing this kid's grandfather to have a gun because of the actions of a mentally ill loner with a history of potential threats? Get real!

There is one point that this event shares with another recent event. This troubled teen obtained his firearms from a police officer. In Georgia, a man overpowered a smaller female deputy and uses a police gun to kill four people. In Minnesota a troubled teen kills his police officer grandfather and takes his guns. How is this a "national problem"? Are they asking us to disarm the police? Of course not, that would be silly.

They are complaining about a "culture of death", meaning firearms, of course, not violent rap music, movies or video games. Just firearms. All firearms.

But it the Brady Campaign and the Million Moms who are standing in the blood of innocents, crying about the blood they have laid at their own feet.

Sarah Brady complains, "When will the government do something to help stop the bloodshed?".

The problem is, local, state and the federal governments have listened to Ms. Brady, et al and already done too much. Too much damage. Across the country there are laws that carve out "victim zones" at which we have seen tragic shootings because the killers know that people are defenseless there. Schools, churches and courthouses are designated "gun free" zones. Where better for a killer to strike at his ex-wife? Or an angry man to go after his fellow worshippers? Or a student to take revenge for his anger? How many more bodies does The Brady Bunch need to see before they realize that after 35 years of "gun control" things have gone from bad to worse?

Over 80 percent of our states now allow citizens to legally carry personal firearms for protection. The rules are stringent, the costs are considerable and for those who think it necessary, it's worth it. In Texas, Mark Wilson had a permit to carry his handgun and he gave his life trying to stop a killer at the courthouse. He may have saved many, but we know he saved at least one life, that of the killer's son.

And wasn't that Mrs. Brady's slogan a few years ago? "If it saves just one life."

Think about it.

BillCA
California

Comments public.
Flames in PM, please.
 
for education, the 16th grade was the most happy three years of my life.

:confused:

I think it would be great to see them put out a press release saying that ll police need to be disarmed. Of course, even I don't think they're that dumb.

Bill - excellent job
 
Beautiful response, Bill. As an ex-Californian, it is nice to see that there are still some people there that believe in personal responsibility and the right to self-defense.
 
If they hadn't disarmed the 'security guard' on the school premises, many lives probably could have been saved in this incident. But no, they must whine and complain about a bunch of irrelevant hooplah to push their agenda.
 
jef,
my senior year in college I could only go part time, because I had been hired as an LE Ranger by the National Park Service and because of LE and other training I could only go part time, hence three years to complete my senior year. The 16th grade.

Bill,
Outstanding article.

Jungle Work
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top