Home safety is not just a gun in a nightstand.
tackdriver said:
I don't believe in fibromyalgia
Irrelevant whether you believe in it or not, or whether the diagnosis is correct or not. If the owner's abilities are compromised, the concern over limitation is real.
tackdriver said:
I always suggest longarms if I think someone isn't willing to put in the time to train with a self-defense firearm.
I have a problem with this statement, too. I always suggest NO firearms if someone is not willing to train adequately, to consider the legal and moral implications of exercising lethal forces and to maintaining the insurance coverage commensurate with that weighty responsibility.
The longarm part, though, I am in TOTAL agreement. See three paragraphs below.
Defense comes in layers. An early warning system is the best first choice. Irritating as they may be, a yappy little dog is a a great early warning device. A medium size dog (in my opinion) is a better companion and just as good an intruder detector. Geese honk madly when a stranger comes into the yard. Motion detector lights hooked up to lights AND siren can be adjusted to do well, also. You get the drift, yes? All this is useful and gives a GREAT deal of help BEFORE the deployment of deadly force is needed.
These early-perimeter measures are GREAT, when backed up by a firearm, but anyone on medications that may impair their response time or time-to-full-capacity (even in the imagination of a lawyer) is doubly served by such devices (dog, geese, motion sensors, entry detectors, etc.)
Home defense should be wide AND deep.
For someone physically compromised (and even those who are not), I suggest a 16 gauge (Why does everyone mention the 12 and 20, but never the 16?) or lightly loaded 12 gauge, or even standard or magnum 12 gauge is MUCH more controllable, manageable and accurate than ANY handgun, bar none.
Mainly suited for stationary defense, the shotgun is ideal for the urban or suburban situation where police 911 response time is acceptable and even better suited for rural situations. Exception, where ranges are beyond shotgun-effective distances, where a (semi-automatic) or true assault rifle or sub-gun would be better. But those situations are rare. The handgun is almost in every situation, a compromise that gives away a LOT to gain portability.
Please pardon my disjointed construction. It is late.
To sum up, my suggestion would be a Remington 870 or 1100, but either with REQUIRED practice and training. Mossberg 500 is more affordable, but the 870 has the endorsement of military and police armorers. Winchester's no slouch either, but I think more expensive.
Lost Sheep