Cracks in my brand new Smith and Wesson 986

Here is a picture of the inside of the Crane / Frame from my Perfect 1956 K-22
Not the perfect spacing of the Chatter marks where the perfect dull cutting bit was fed to fast. I can show you similar chatter marks on the top strap of a 1967 highway patrolman....

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • chatter2.JPG
    chatter2.JPG
    79.9 KB · Views: 319
Shocking what has become of S&W quality. Look at this.

RM.jpg


Thats a 1935 Smith and Wesson Registered Magnum.

There are no cracks...there are no gouges on your gun.
 
Definitely better sand back then. :D
Perfect sand. No dents, dings, scratches, or scrapes.
Sand quality today is deplorable.
Sigh......
Denis
 
As a point of reference, this picture is the inside of a recent 629 (just barely pre lock). Compare that to the photo of the Registered Magnum I posted. I think, honestly, the machining has improved in the last 80 or so years. So, I may not like the fact that the blue isn't as deep blue as it used to be and, they have switched to production methods that aren't quite the same as they used to be but, honestly, its very good.

I recall in the late 1970's my friends at the Dallas PD gun range got a shipment of brand new S&W 64's in. They told me that half of them were not fit to be issued when they unwrapped them. Timing, carry up issues etc.

They were able to fix about half of that group and get them issued out but, the rest had to returned to Smith and Wesson for major repairs or replacement.

Now, we are not talking about a little cosmetic flaw here and there, we are talking about guns that didn't work.


IMG_0177.jpg
 
Yes, the old guns WERE perfect.
Not a scratch, not a scrape, not a ding, not a dent, not a flaw, not a fault anywhere.

A sad world we live in today....
Denis

Oh really? Take a look at the machining inside the frame on this prewar K38. This type of machining was done on pattern following millers, before the existence of CNC machining. Pattern following equipment was operated by hand, with the operator manipulating the cutter path by using a stylus to follow a pattern. Pretty messy looking machining if you ask me.

Of course the surface finish of the floor of the frame does not matter, it is all clearance area. The only thing that really matters is the surface of the studs where the trigger, hammer, and bolt stop rotated. They were a few thousandths above the bottom surface of the frame, so that surface could be as messy as this. However the profile where the side plate fitted had to be just about perfect.

tool_marks_K-38-1.jpg





Compare that to the surface finish of this Model 17-3 from 1975. CNC equipment had come into play by this time, so tool paths and feed rates were computer controlled, resulting in a far superior finish. Not that it really mattered, because as with the earlier gun, it is all a clearance cut. Except for the rub mark where the rebound slide slides.

17framecloseup_zps3b6a4e13.jpg



Inside of the frame of a 617-6, from about 2007 if I recall correctly. Notice the raised surfaces of the studs are gone, replaced by raised surfaces on the frame floor for the parts to rotate against. Bottom line, it is cheaper to machine fancy features like that than it is to make studs with a bearing surface and press them in just the right amount.

617framecloseup_zpse4e420c0.jpg
 
"I guess DPris should've used the :rolleyes:, because no one is catching the sarcasm...:eek:"

That's because he used modern sarcasm. If he used good old sarcasm everyone would get it.
 
It is worth noting that the (excellent, as usual) pictures by Driftwood Johnson show not only changes in the milling but also in the studs themselves. The two older guns have machined studs, with three diameters. The newest gun has studs that are simple single diameter pins, inserted to a drive fit into the frame. One more example of making a product less expensive without sacrificing quality and without the customer even knowing there is a difference.

BTW, before removing the sideplate from ANY S&W revolver, always relieve mainspring tension first. One end of the hammer stud is supported by the sideplate and if full mainspring tension is kept when the sideplate is removed, the stud can break. It is a very, very rare occurrence, but a broken stud may mean returning the gun to the factory; most local gunsmiths won't tackle the job.

Jim
 
Customers hold Key

These same "quality issues"will continue,unless/until customers demand better.But be prepared to pay for it! :D
 
These same "quality issues"will continue,unless/until customers demand better.But be prepared to pay for it!

I'm just one guy but on something that costs upwards of a grand, I'd be glad to pay an extra $50 to "make it nice", or at least to "make it right"...
 
For those with the $, there's the Korth. Very nice, but a little too spendy for most of them. Although that 9mm Sky Marshal is interesting.
 
Back
Top