Cost spread of handguns, nuts.

Glock is also selling a whole lot more pistols that it was not that many years back which helps them maintain their prices.

No one else has a reputation for being a well proven design like Glock. They won the FBI contract after extensive testing and FBI saying Glock is the most reliable pistol it has ever tested. Now with Border Patrol and Secret Service going to Glock have added further to their reputation. Individuals may like certain features on competing pistols poly striker fired pistol more than Glock but none other has come close to being as proven a design. Glock has been established as a premium brand and allows Glock to price their products accordingly.
 
Glock is also selling a whole lot more pistols that it was not that many years back which helps them maintain their prices.
Click to expand...

They do have economies of scale which is nice for them. When you look at the Product Life Cycle, you kind of have to wonder where they are on the curve.

Glock has been established as a premium brand and allows Glock to price their products accordingly.
Click to expand...


Not really. If I go on Bud's right now the S&W M&P9 2.0 and Gen 5 Glock 19 are selling for exactly the same price at $539. Bud's isn't always cheapest but they are the most ubiquitous at this point.
 
The good news is that it is a buyers market in firearms with many excellent choices available. Something for just about everybody at a price point they like. I just hope it lasts for a while yet.
 
The good news is that it is a buyers market in firearms with many excellent choices available. Something for just about everybody at a price point they like. I just hope it lasts for a while yet.
Click to expand...

Yep, 35 years ago if you had a CHL your options were mostly:

- Some kind of J-Frame
- Tough it out with a full size heavy as a brick gun
- A Cheaply made, unreliable automatic
- An antique

Now there is something for everyone and affordable. Glock changed the whole shooting world with one pistol.
 
osbornk Quote:
Originally Posted by dogtown tom View Post
Glock hasn't raised their wholesale price since I've been in business....eleven years.
Click to expand...

I don't think Glock can raise their prices because many other manufacturers sell very similar products that perform at least as well as a Glock for a much cheaper price.
Click to expand...
Glock doesn't control the retail price, and many dealers are able to sell significantly higher than Glocks Minimum Advertised Price.
Please list the pistols that perform as well as a Glock for less $$$. There is a reason Glocks sell like they do.



I saw s Youtube video last week made by an employee of a "big name" gun store. He said a lot of people look at a Glock but they buy similar guns by other manufactures due to the price and grip angle.
Click to expand...
Lotsa folks buy Hi Points too.;)
 
Glock changed the whole shooting world with one pistol.
Click to expand...

The only change to my shooting world GLock made was to add some irritation. :rolleyes:

as for the cost, don't bother to get wound up over the number of dollars, look at what it takes YOU to get those dollars.

In the mid 70s, when I was making $300 a month, a $150 handgun was expensive. (two weeks pay)

A decade later, I was making $350 a week and even a $300 dollar pistol wasn't as expensive as a $150 pistol had been. (less than one week's pay, instead of two)

How many hours do you have to work, today, to buy that $700 pistol??
 
sigarms228 said:
Glock is also selling a whole lot more pistols that it was not that many years back which helps them maintain their prices.

No one else has a reputation for being a well proven design like Glock. They won the FBI contract after extensive testing and FBI saying Glock is the most reliable pistol it has ever tested. Now with Border Patrol and Secret Service going to Glock have added further to their reputation. Individuals may like certain features on competing pistols poly striker fired pistol more than Glock but none other has come close to being as proven a design. Glock has been established as a premium brand and allows Glock to price their products accordingly.
Click to expand...
Don't sully this whole thing with facts..this is turning out to be a 'let's bash Glock' thread(again).
Fact is, Glock makes a great, reliable, accurate handgun(s) for not much money. Yes there are some others, but there is also lots of YT videos about their various issues...not one offs but design problems and how great the company is or isn't trying to fix them. More than few referenced in this forum.

I'm pretty new returnee to the whole handgun scene..first one was a S&W model 39 I got in 1977...had a FTF almost every magazine..
Nothing till about 3 years ago when I went shooting with son and his G17..it has had ZERO failures in probably 7500 rounds..OBTW-he cleans it about once a year, maybe.
When I went with him when he bought a G43..I bought a Ruger LC9S..mostly cuz it was $150 less than his G43..what an incredible POS..sold it..went to another Ruger, a S&W, tried 2-3 Sigs..and bought a Glock 17/4..have since bought a -19, 43, 42...

Prices(since that's what this thread is all about?)..ranged from low $400s to $500..none more than that, all new..VERY happy.
 
On the Taurus G2S, the recoil spring will come over the top of that plastic-ended guide rod in the long run and the gun will lock. The striker guide is not a necessary replacement.
 
e076291300125304f07ea1a25b171c5a.jpg
my first handgun. Cost 49.95...Lawrence holster cost 20.00. Browning Nomad.22. 1963 or 64. Took all my lawn mowing money. Couldn’t believe my mom said ok! Still have it and the red and black plastic case.
 
sigarms228 said:
Glock has been established as a premium brand and allows Glock to price their products accordingly.
Click to expand...
I have never regarded Glock as a premium brand. I have always regarded Glock as a mundane, middle-of-the-road, commodity-grade handgun, nothing more.
 
Aguila Blanca
Quote:
Originally Posted by sigarms228
Glock has been established as a premium brand and allows Glock to price their products accordingly.
Click to expand...
I have never regarded Glock as a premium brand. I have always regarded Glock as a mundane, middle-of-the-road, commodity-grade handgun, nothing more.
Click to expand...
I disagree.
Brand value is not the same as intrinsic value or retail price of a particular handgun.
As a BRAND, Glock may be the preeminent brand. Heck, how many others firearm brands have themselves in dozens of song lyrics?:D

As soon as John McClain said "That punk pulled a Glock 7 on me. You know what that is? It's a porcelain gun made in Germany. It doesn't show up on your airport X-ray machines here and it costs more than what you make in a month!" Glock as a brand became premium, even if everything was incorrect in that movie line.

The value of a brand is built on reputation, not the price of the product.

"Coca Cola" as a brand has a bit more worth than the three cents worth of product inside the bottle.....thats why Coca Cola costs more than the generic or Sam's Choice cola.

Same with Bic pens, 3M Post It Notes and thousands of other products.
 
Brand value is not the same as intrinsic value or retail price of a particular....
Click to expand...

It's not brand value, its the value of brand recognition, and it goes both ways, positive and negative.

Famous doesn't mean best. Nor does it even necessarily mean good, it just means well known.
 
peterg7 said:
When I bought my first handgun in 1982 the Blackhawk (41mag) cost $180.00 OTD NIB, I was making $12.00 hr as a production machinist.

Today that gun is $535. + at Buds, using an inflation calculator it should be $478.58

So yes guns have gone up more than inflation, exorbitant? That up to the buyer to decide. But there’s also value in SD guns that didn’t exist in 1982 that make this a more cost friendly time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Production CNC machinists today are making $14-18/hr.

This is horrific that in 35 years wages have only gone up about 33% while inflation has gone up about 3 times that.

One major issue is that the guns made today are not better made than they were in 1982. More often than not they're worse.
 
Aguila Blanca said:
I have never regarded Glock as a premium brand. I have always regarded Glock as a mundane, middle-of-the-road, commodity-grade handgun, nothing more.
Click to expand...
Yet, often more expensive than the 'competitors', yet Glock sell tons 'o them..Honda Civic vs Hyundai Elantra/Kia Forte.....
 
I am not a Glock enthusiast, but I did have one a couple of decades ago. It was a long slide for which I think I paid $500. I noticed the following virtues that were found on the other pistols I'd had previously.

1. A very simple trigger and striker design. I know a lot of people hated the feel of that trigger, but it never bothered me.

2. The polymer lower.

3. A slide finish that was durable and resisted corrosion well.

I hated the grip and the absence of a frame mounted safety lock.

Now everyone as a polymer framed pistol and a Tenifer-like process for their slides, so some of the features that distinguished a Glock are now ubiquitous.

I do regret the general move to strikers. I've had some hammer fired pistols with triggers I liked (smooth and light with little overtravel), but have never felt a striker fired pistol with an equally good trigger. Friends say the Sig 365 has a very nice trigger.

If that is a $500 to $600 pistol now, it's less expensive than that old Glock and may be a better product overall.

Recoilspring said:
Why the high prices on the traditional gun makers when an SVD or a G2 will work just fine?
Click to expand...

In the case of the SDV, I'd guess that a lot of people don't want a Glock knock-off with an even funnier trigger, even if the grip does seem to fit human hands better.

In the case of the G2, because buyers think those may be a bit of a gamble, whereas people expect better from more expensive purchases (HK customer service excepted). At less than half the price of a Sig365xl, I find the G2 interesting, but I've read reviews that give me reliability and durability reservations about them.

The Honda/Hyundai analogy may be apt. Honda's reputation is excellent, but they put out lemons too, and some categorically poor products.
 
The Honda/Hyundai analogy may be apt. Honda's reputation is excellent, but they put out lemons too, and some categorically poor products.
Click to expand...

BUT not because of design, generally..Altho Hyundai/Kia have come a long way, many are still considered 'throw-away'..not many 'categorically poor products' from Honda I can find.
First gen Glocks, where they started and then built on their reputation, was excellent design..continued today.

I donno...not expensive, very reliable, accurate, fun to shoot..Glock works for me. :). And my 2 kids.
BUT, I'm a 'utility' kinda guy. Want the car, drill, hammer, dish washer, TV, phone, etc, to just work, not into paying more $ for bells, whistles, shiny bits, pretty...pretty when it comes to a gun is not something that I understand, 'glocks are just so ugly'...
-shrug shoulders...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3916 copy.jpg
    IMG_3916 copy.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
I don't dispute that Glock has a simplicity of design that doesn't call for a lot of change, though some changes have been requested and not forthcoming for a very long time.

I'm a fan of some Ruger designs, and I wish they had stuck with a philosophy that having made a great pistol, the P series, they would tweek it, but not fundamentally change and abandon it. Instead, they have so many new things that I've lost track.

USNRet93 said:
BUT not because of design, generally..Altho Hyundai/Kia have come a long way, many are still considered 'throw-away'..not many 'categorically poor products' from Honda I can find.
Click to expand...

I'm a bit of a car guy, and have the benefit of periodic curiosity directed at some people in the industry. Hyundai sold at a discount a couple of decades ago despite marketing a reliable product. The discount wasn't modest--something like 20% as compared to comparable Hondas. Now they are essentially as expensive as Hondas, their reputation having caught up to the reality of their products. Hyundais currently have fewer problems on average than Hondas. https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2019-initial-quality-study-iqs

Honda is a small engine company the way Lotus is a suspension company and Porsche is a more general automotive engineering company. Honda has some engineering blind spots though. I shopped for a Honda Fit/Jazz a couple of years ago and noted that some were quiet and others very noisy. I asked someone in the industry who responded that no Honda Fit has flush doors. They aren't made so that all four doors will fit similarly on the frame, and it isn't fixable in the manufacturing process. I've looked at a half dozen nd haven't found one with four properly fit doors. Yet Honda keeps making them that way because people buy them.

Translate this into firearms. HKs are great, right? Yes, they are great unless they aren't in which case HK aren't reputed to be very helpful. Glock doesn't offer a lot of change, but it doesn't have to, Glock buyers knowing what they like. Taurus tries a lot of different ideas, not all of them good and not all of them well executed, but they get people to try them with modest pricing.
 
Production CNC machinists today are making $14-18/hr.

This is horrific that in 35 years wages have only gone up about 33% while inflation has gone up about 3 times that.
Click to expand...

A sidebar but that is all changing now. The average has already shifted to $18 an hour. Most make between $16-$22 an hour with experienced workers making much more. I am seeing kids that graduated from high school five years ago making North of $60K around here. If someone is making $14 an hour they need to be looking for a new job.
No idea what caused all that.

https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Production_Machinist/Hourly_Rate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top