Constitutional Carry vs Business Owners

steve4102 said:
I think it doesn't have anything to do with your question.

You asked, essentially, whether, based on provisions of the Kentucky Constitution, a business open to the public could bar openly carried guns. The statutes and cases cited address the legality of carrying guns in public. I didn't see anything preventing someone with a property interest declining permission to enter on his property if someone is carrying a gun.

It's well established that the United States Constitution does not regulate private conduct. Therefore, the Second Amendment can not prevent a business owner from barring firearms on his premises.

State constitutions have to a limited extent been applied to private conduct. If there were a Supreme Court of Kentucky cases applying the RKBA provisions to private conduct, it hasn't been cited in the material you've posted.

It's true that a business denying access to someone because he is legally carrying a gun is discriminatory, BUT --

  • In general, discrimination is not illegal. You do it all the time. Every time you decide to shop in this store rather than that, you have discriminated. Every time you decide to buy this rather than that, you have discriminated.

  • Businesses discriminate all the time too, and legally. Apple stores discriminate against people who want to buy a PC by only selling Apple computers. Many restaurant discriminate against Orthodox Jews or Muslims by not strictly following the dietary laws of those religions. Many restaurants also discriminate against persons not wearing shirts and/or shoes by not admitting them. Tiffany discriminates against poor people in the prices they charge. Businesses also discriminate whenever they hire one person instead of another who has applied for the job.

  • Discrimination is merely choosing one thing over another or rejecting a possible choice. Discrimination is the very essence of freedom and private property. It is the right to choose. It is the right to exclude. It is the right to decide how you want to use your property.

  • Discrimination is perfectly legal, unless some law makes it illegal. There are laws that make discrimination illegal on various, specifically identified and defined bases, illegal -- at least if you're a business open to the public or an employer or in some other specified category. In general, gun owners aren't a protected class.

  • The statutes are specific as to rights protected, against what conduct, and for whom. If something you think is a right isn't included in the statute, and if some private conduct should be included but isn't, and if some class of people you think ought to be protected isn't included in the statute, that "right" and/or that class of people aren't protected by the statute against that conduct.

So at this point I see no reason to conclude that a business otherwise open to the public in Kentucky can't bar persons who are legally openly carrying a gun.
 
Thanks Frank, but I basically had two questions.

1) It is my understanding that Open Carry is guaranteed by the KY State Constitution and one can open carry "anywhere", whereas Concealed carry comes with certain restrictions. True?

2)because Open Carry is a Constitution Right in KY, that businesses that are "open" to the public cannot even post a "No Open Carry" sign?
 
1) It is my understanding that Open Carry is guaranteed by the KY State Constitution and one can open carry "anywhere", whereas Concealed carry comes with certain restrictions. True?
False.

1. Even if it were true that KY law doesn't restrict it, there are federal laws that restrict where you can carry a gun.
2. Even if it were true that KY law doesn't restrict it, a property owner can restrict it in at least some cases.
3. You, yourself posted two examples of KY law that restrict fireams, including those that are openly carried.
2)because Open Carry is a Constitution Right in KY, that businesses that are "open" to the public cannot even post a "No Open Carry" sign?
False. Frank's last post addresses this question fairly comprehensively.
 
Open carry is constitutionally protected here in Kentucky but concealed carry is by permit only & NOT constitutionally protected.
Prohibited places are enumerated in KRS statutes, which includes court rooms, police & sheriff offices, any room where a legislative body is holding their meetings, any property or building owned/leased by the federal government. This applies to ALL TYPES OF CARRY.
Private businesses, open to the public or not, can post signage to prohibit weapons but do not carry the force of law. If however, you decide to carry here, you can be asked to leave. If you refuse, you can be charged with criminal trespassing.
See KRS Chapter 237
 
The part in the last post about being asked to leave or then charged with trespass seems to be common among many states with similar laws on the books.
Private property rights trump your carry rights
 
Private businesses, open to the public or not, can post signage to prohibit weapons but do not carry the force of law. If however, you decide to carry here, you can be asked to leave. If you refuse, you can be charged with criminal trespassing.

Right, so while you may be able to carry there legally under the law, you can be cited/arrested for trespass if you refuse to leave (or whatever the specific legal process is there). So you don't get dinged for carry, but do get dinged for trespass.
 
Sadly, the right to constitutional open carry in Kentucky is very debatable. The Kentucky Supreme Court has applied the rational basis standard of review regarding this state right. See page 9 at http://162.114.92.72/Opinions/2004-...1e9b+2236+4eaf+4f60+&hc=78&req=posey+and+2004. Rational basis is an extremely low standard; i.e., is there any rational reason to restrict or deny the right. Very few laws fail to meet that standard. I discussed it at some length in this post -- http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=201182. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the issue was decided on a case with bad facts (felon in possession of a firearm). The case is published which means it is binding precedent.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top