First of all, I missed the show. No one I know was able to tape it or TiVo it, so I missed out. But the comments above are telling.
I've already seen the videos of children as young as three reciting chants about killing Jews. Others feature kids ranting that the U.S. and Israel must be destroyed. By the time they are nearing their teens the rhetoric is bolder and more explicit -- creating rivers of blood from the slashed throats of the Jews. The children are indoctrinated from cradle to (early?) grave with an ideology that says Jews are descended from pigs that bred with humans, Americans are puppets of the Jews. Christianity is a perversion of Islam (Christ was Islamic, don't you know?) and thus an affront to both Allah and Mohammed.
The last time I saw videos like this, where young children were being indoctrinated to believe other peoples were inferior, the catch phrase was "Deutschland uber allies". The same principles were used - feed them full of propaganda in schools and in state-controlled media, suppress opposing views until they were old enough to be cannon fodder.
Read the accounts of those surviving the Islamic "conversion" of territories in the middle east. People who were forced to "convert" to Islam under the threat of death were subsequently given status of 2nd class subjects (not citizens!). In such cases, these people were forbidden to own property or operate businesses (similar to the Nazi anti-Jewish laws). More over, if a dispute ends up in an Islamic court, the 2nd class subject can be barred from entering the courtroom based on their having been "forced" to convert, thus they always lose the case.
AFAIK, Islam is the only religion that has written in its scriptures that non-believers should be killed if they refuse to convert. Certainly other religious societies have, in the past, tried to force their beliefs on others but it is not part of the scriptures to kill them if they balk at conversion.
Too, I find it difficult to believe that, under Islamic law, men control while women are looked at as property -- when you consider the reason women must wear a burka. Apparently the sight of a woman's body - even an unclad ankle or arm - is sufficient to send Muslim men into a drooling, mindless lust. A woman "exposing herself" cannot claim rape under Islamic law, no matter how innocently it may have been done. Essentially, it is her fault for tempting that good, devout Muslim fellow beyond his control. However, I suggest that if they cannot control their primitive urges, they are unworthy to be followers of either Allah or Mohammmed.
When Islamo-fascist terrorists hide behind a group of women, they themselves are using women as property, like we might use an automobile for cover. Their tactic is, of course, politically motivated, knowing that our media will foam at the mouth over soldiers "mowing down" so-called innocent women to shoot the terrorists. The Muslims win if we hold our fire because they fire from behind human shields and they win the media war if we shoot back, killing "non-combatant" women. This is not to say we should be indiscriminate with our aim, however.
In the middle east, politics is practiced by men at almost every level of society. This should be expected, since their society favors family dynasties and strict obedience to Islamic law. Each level tries to curry favor with those above, who are better connected, in hopes of bettering their own position. Politics to them is part of their social structure and they are generally much better at it than most other societies.
In such a society, lying becomes an art form. Since lying about another Muslim can get you a very harsh sentence, the lie is not in what you say, but in how you say it. Their religion does not require truthfulness when dealing with "infidels" as long as the lie does not offend Islam (which seems to be most of the time).
At this point in time, I don't have a solution other than hitting them (islamic terrorists) hard, fast and not worrying overly much about the collateral damage.
