Close Combat

Close Combat Weapon

  • M4

    Votes: 8 38.1%

  • AKSU 74

    Votes: 4 19.0%

  • AK 47

    Votes: 7 33.3%

  • MP5

    Votes: 8 38.1%

  • Uzi

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Walther MPK

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Tavor

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Ak74

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • G3 (folding stock)

    Votes: 4 19.0%

  • AR15

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
Shotgun is not included in the list because it is not a comba[]t weapon, but no doubt a good self defense weapon.
Click to expand...

The shotgun is a highly effective tool. The only reason militaries don't typically use them is they have been prohibited by international treaty.

Also, figure this - an AR15/M16 holds 30 rounds (military configuration). An 8-shot 12 gauge with #00 buckshot can send down range: 8 rounds x 9 pellets = 72 projectiles.
 
The shotgun is a highly effective tool. The only reason militaries don't typically use them is they have been prohibited by international treaty.
Click to expand...

Say what? The US military has had quite a few combat shotguns over the years.
 
MAL ... it was a mistake. Should be MPK. Its a machine pistol size of an UZI.


....I ma surprised that M4 which is prime American Commando weapon is not getting any attention here. Is it because civilians in US do not have access to it or there is some other reason?
 
If this is room to room, or door to door, and I can have an AK47, I can also have a 14 inch 12 gauge pump shotgun, with an inch or two cut off the stock, which leaves you with a very compact weapon that can be fired just like a fullsize shotgun, and puts more lead on target faster than a submachine gun.
 
PPK corrected to MPK.

(But, I was chuckling to myself picturing a German SWAT team performing a house cleaning all armed with PPK's! :) )
 
Say what? The US military has had quite a few combat shotguns over the years.
Click to expand...

Last I looked - and vets, correct me if I'm wrong - the use of shotguns on the battlefield was considered a violation of the Hauge convention on warfare. I know that some guys carried them early in Vietnam, at least until Johnson increased the deployments. And I know shotguns were frequently carried by some MP's and SP's at checkpoints and airfields, but their role was limited.
 
We are using shotguns in Iraq. Mostly for "breaching" doors I think, but there are some being used for more traditional jobs as well.
shotgun3.jpg

[
shotgun2.jpg

Shotgun1.jpg
 
My point is that shotguns are not typically used as an anti-personnel arm in the battlefield like the M4/M16.
 
I read in some online military magazine that while shotguns are sometimes used for house-clearing in Iraq, they aren't favored for that purpose because of the potential for collateral damage. Apparently they worry about the spread of the shot and stray pellets. While the spread shouldn't be that much over typical room-clearing distances, I can understand the concern.

Shotguns were used to great effect in other conflicts, like the jungles of Vietnam and the trench warfare of WWI.

BillCA said:
Last I looked - and vets, correct me if I'm wrong - the use of shotguns on the battlefield was considered a violation of the Hauge convention on warfare.
Click to expand...
I'm not a vet, but I have some info on that. Basically, what happened was the Germans filed a diplomatic protest during WWI against the use of the shotgun, saying that it was inhumane because of the devastation it causes at close range. The protest didn't work, however, and the shotgun has never been found to be against the laws of warfare.

The references listed at the end of this Wikipedia article have some good info on the subject:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_shotgun

An interesting statistic cited in that article:

The delivery of the large number of projectiles simultaneously makes the shotgun the most effective short range weapon commonly used, with a hit probability 45% greater than a submachine gun, and twice as great as an assault rifle[1]. While each pellet is only as effective as a small caliber handgun, and offers very poor penetration against an armored target, the multiple projectiles increases the likelihood of one or more peripheral wounds.
Click to expand...
 
Steelcore - thanks for that update. :cool:

I can't recall which book it was in, though it was probably about the works of Julian Hatcher or one of Fackler's writings that quoted the surgeon general of the U.S. Army as saying the shotgun is a devastating weapon and close range wounds resemble damage done by artillery more than those of small arms.

The High-Standard Model 10 shotgun was a terrific gun - if you could get it working reliably. I wonder why no one has thought of making a parts kit for 870's or Mossbergs to turn reliable semi-autos into "bullpup" designs? Recoil was mild and the ease of handling was superb.

I once ran through a house-clearing drill with an M1 Carbine and developed a fondness for its quick handling and close range capabilities. But a short, fast handling shotgun would still be my first choice.
 
I once ran through a house-clearing drill with an M1 Carbine and developed a fondness for its quick handling and close range capabilities. But a short, fast handling shotgun would still be my first choice.
Click to expand...
I've never held or fired one, and I don't know how reliable they are, but I'd think that one of those Saiga 12 gauges would probably fit the bill for house clearing as far as size goes.

Jason
 
It is very amusing how the pictures go with the signatured quote since it is his town who quote is in the signature which is being bombed and shattered everyday.
 
From an article on the military use of Winchester 1897 in the old Handgunner Ltd:

"Trench raiding was what th gun was intended for, hence the name. But it could also be quite devastating against the massed infantry attacks characteristic of the Great War. Paul Jenkins recalled one incident in which the '97s were used to give concentrated fire across a section of front after the rifles and machine guns had done their best:

When those shotguns got going -- with nine .34 calibre buckshot per load, six loads in a gun, 200-odd men firing, plenty more shells at hand -- the front ranks of the assault wave simply piled up on top of one another in one awful heap of buckshot-drilled men."

If one man with a pumpgun is a dangerous adversary, what of two infantry companies with shotguns in a day of bolt action rifles?

The article discusses the German diplomatic protest against trench guns, but a picture caption under a buckshot shell and US marked shotgun says it well enough: "Krauts hated buckshot, which blew the points off their funny little hats."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top