Aguila Blanca
Staff
Obviously, a conversion top end can't shrink the pistol by 15 percent, so no conversion is going to give you a scaled-down version of the real thing, like a Browning 1911-22. If you put a conversion top end on a Hi-Power receiver, the receiver and the action parts all remain unchanged, so the "heart" of the resulting pistol is still going to be Hi-Power. Speaking to the comparison of the Colt/Umarex 1911-22 vs a 1911 with a Ciener conversion, the manual of arms remains the same for both, but the field strip procedure for the Colt/Umarex is completely different (and counter-intuitive), whereas the slide comes off the Ciener just like a "real" 1911. I assume the same is going to apply to a Hi-Power conversion but, as I've noted, I haven't ever handled one of those.johnwilliamson062 said:And that is the difference I was trying to point out. One, the Browning, is an 85% size 1911 chambered in 22. That is exactly what I want. The 85% is probably about perfect for my hand. The other, the Colt/Umarex, really just kind of aesthetically looks like a 1911.
Does the Ciened conversion get me something that is mostl HiPower like the Browning is mostly 1911, or something that kind of looks like a HiPower like the Umarex kind of looks like a 1911.
I'd say what you would end up with will be "substantially" like a Hi-Power. (Whatever that means.)
This short video might address your question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvrZ-x4xM3Y