Just bought a CETME.
It really is the same as the fal...but totally different. Ive owned a L1A1 and now a cetme.
Now, heres the difference. I havent shot the cetme yet, and it has a freakin huge scope. so that will effect the accuracy. I will null any accuracy claims from my opinion since they are untried.
The cetme in my opinion feels better. Quicker target acquisition with scope and without scope. It just is easier to bring it up to my face. Its SO much more comfortable of a hold, the FAL is nice but not as ergonomic.
But, the one thing I though I thought Id love about the CETME that I hate is the damn charging handle.....What the hell were they thinking. Also, the mags SUCK. Gotta basically slam them home for them to catch.
All in all, whoever says the CETME sucks is ignorant. The CETME may suck for them, compared to their 223 plinkers, but when It comes to a fully functional battle rifle...you cant really go wrong with the CETME and HK91, or the FAL for that matter.
Every weapon has a purpose, what is the purpose you need a weapon for?
Before you get a gun who "looks cool" young blood, research the functionality. Im not saying your getting it because it looks cool, but once you go with a 308 battle rifle your stuck with something you may not have figured or wanted