Thanks for the info. Didn't get the email so this is great. probably had something he had in mind with the move from NC to Utah or IdahoFWIW, Beltman the company changed hands a few months ago. The new owner took the time to email at least some previous customers
"...doesn't really matter what belt..." Yeah it does. A cheap thin belt won't hold the extra weight and the pistol will sag in the holster.
What you carry makes a difference here, too. While I'm a proponent of having a proper gunbelt, an LCP just won't make your pants sag the way a gov't model 1911 will.Targa said:Lol....sounds good, I will remember that. I just took the dogs for a walk carrying IWB, I didn't even have a belt on, nope, just the holster on the waistband of my jeans, didn't shift anywhere I didn't want it to."...doesn't really matter what belt..." Yeah it does. A cheap thin belt won't hold the extra weight and the pistol will sag in the holster.
Fair enough, I have never carried full size. My IWB has consisted of a Glock 26, a 642 and my current carry which is a CM9. Now when I carried the G26 OWB a belt, nothing special, just a belt, was obviously necessary to feed through my Safariland holster and to hold my pants up.