Seems like alot of guys buy the en vogue superlight .357 snubnose revolvers for CCW and/or nightstand gun, then often they end up practicing with, and carrying .38's in them.
Usually it's because the .357's were too punishing out of such a short-barreled lightweight. Or maybe they don't want the blast/flash of a .357 indoors?
Ballistically, it looks like the .357 is a BIG step up from .38. But is .38 good enough? Or does the convenient carry of an airweight .38 sacrifice some stopping power - just a natural tradeoff?
I'm considering an SP101 myself. But I'd like to occasionally shoot magnums. So I started thinking why not get a SP101 .38 Spl for CCW loaded with a good +P load, then get a heavier GP100 for more fun with magnums at the range?
Another thing is with .38's fired out of a .357, don't you lose some effectiveness with the longer chamber versus a dedicated .38 chamber? Then it makes the gun harder to clean as well versus a dedicated .38.
Or is the consensus that it's better to have the versatility of either load in a .357, and just deal with the recoil/flash/blast if the SHTF?
Usually it's because the .357's were too punishing out of such a short-barreled lightweight. Or maybe they don't want the blast/flash of a .357 indoors?
Ballistically, it looks like the .357 is a BIG step up from .38. But is .38 good enough? Or does the convenient carry of an airweight .38 sacrifice some stopping power - just a natural tradeoff?
I'm considering an SP101 myself. But I'd like to occasionally shoot magnums. So I started thinking why not get a SP101 .38 Spl for CCW loaded with a good +P load, then get a heavier GP100 for more fun with magnums at the range?
Another thing is with .38's fired out of a .357, don't you lose some effectiveness with the longer chamber versus a dedicated .38 chamber? Then it makes the gun harder to clean as well versus a dedicated .38.
Or is the consensus that it's better to have the versatility of either load in a .357, and just deal with the recoil/flash/blast if the SHTF?