4thHorseman
New member
I suspect many American feel differently than some posters.
The sale of hand guns, ammo and other arms normally go up during a high threat level, for an example, after the attack on the World Trade Towers.
I do not feel their concern is the actual premise that they are defending the USA from another country, but rather the actual aftermath of an attack on their homeland. Hurricane Katerina, even though not a attack, did in fact cause chaos and personal security issues for many citizens in the the country itself.
In many aspects, I believe changing you carry during these times is nothing more than a prudent action because if you are relying on the the country's police and laws to protect you during the aftermath of a disaster , man made or other wise, I believe many 911 call may go unanswered. Transportation and communication will breakdown. You will be left with your own defense (not offense) to remain safe.
So if you step back and look at the larger picture, the main threat would be not be the actual attack, but the loss or breakdown of society after the threat becomes a post disaster reality.
JMHO
The sale of hand guns, ammo and other arms normally go up during a high threat level, for an example, after the attack on the World Trade Towers.
I do not feel their concern is the actual premise that they are defending the USA from another country, but rather the actual aftermath of an attack on their homeland. Hurricane Katerina, even though not a attack, did in fact cause chaos and personal security issues for many citizens in the the country itself.
In many aspects, I believe changing you carry during these times is nothing more than a prudent action because if you are relying on the the country's police and laws to protect you during the aftermath of a disaster , man made or other wise, I believe many 911 call may go unanswered. Transportation and communication will breakdown. You will be left with your own defense (not offense) to remain safe.
So if you step back and look at the larger picture, the main threat would be not be the actual attack, but the loss or breakdown of society after the threat becomes a post disaster reality.
JMHO