And when better of a time to do it than after the first 2 shots.
How about when he's dropped his weapon, and not before?
And when better of a time to do it than after the first 2 shots.
Possibly training with a verity of reactive targets would be better in that such would interject mental awareness of shot impacts.
My point is that by not doing an assessment and simply shooting till the threat is on the ground, you may miss the fact that the subject is wearing body armor. In which case, most if not all experts agree that a head shot is required to completely neutralize the thread. How would one ever realize that a head shot is required if they were not analyzing the threat to see if their shots are having the desired effect. Also what if using a snubby 5 shot revolver. Faced with the possibility of 2 threats simultaneously, the amount of ammo consumed with threat #1 becomes paramount if threat #2 is still around when you’ve “serviced” threat #1.
more effective than delivering the prescribed standard response and admiring your work.
Someone might have already mentioned this, if so I apologize. But the first time I ever heard of that term was in teh Infantry. When you conduct an ambush, you double-tap any enemy soldiers down in the kill zone just before you search them for anything of intelligence value.