Actually, the military velocity changed a bit over time. It was 2700 fps, as Mr. O'Heir says, for the early stuff: .30 M1906 with a 150 grain bullet loaded with a charge of Pyro DG, a long-gone rifle powder that was less progressive and faster than the modern stuff. M2 Ball used in '03A3's and Garands for practice in WWII was loaded to 2740 fps with a 152-grain bullet (that's the maximum weight, as it's a unilaterally toleranced value with the critical side of the value at that maximum number, but the tolerance was -3.0 grains, so 150.5 grains was the average weight). Here's the catch, though. The old chronograph systems measured velocity at 78 feet, which is halfway between 6 feet and 150 feet, where the sensor coils were placed. So the muzzle velocity was higher. Hatcher's Book of the Garand, page 125, gives his extrapolated MV of 2805 ft/s. I have used range tables developed by military firings of that round to get a good drag model for it, and it looks to me like it would have been closer to 2802 fps, not that the difference matters much. In either case, neither of those are true muzzle velocities but rather are what the velocity would have to be at the muzzle position if the bullet were already flying from somewhere behind it and then went over the sensors. In the actual gun the muzzle velocity is a bit lower than that and the muzzle blast adds some speed to the bullet for the first few inches and it doesn't start to slow until after it catches up with the velocity of the expanding muzzle blast sphere. The error is probably on the order 70 fps or so.